Learn Ember, Rust and Xstate

Jotai's state management is primitive and flexible. This gives you room to build, compose, and share state throughout your application exactly how you need it.

This flexibility can become hard to manage when you have complex requirements that span across a number of states your application can be in.

Jotai lets you leverage other state management solutions through integrations so that you can solve the problem you're facing exactly how you need to.

One of those integrations is XState. XState gives you a safe abstraction to enumerate and handle the complex states your application can be in.

With Jotai + XState, you get the flexibility and ease of use of Jotai with the power of XState.

XState is a sophisticated library to provide a better and safer abstraction for state management. 

React is one of the web’s most popular frameworks for building JavaScript applications. 

If you know what you’re doing, React can drastically simplify how you build, use, and maintain code.

Whether you’re a React newbie or you’re ready for advanced techniques, you can level-up with egghead. Explore our in-depth courses, lessons, and community resources to build more powerful applications and crack open your career.

react

Complex State Management in React with Jotai and XState

Statecharts are a formalism for modeling stateful, reactive systems. This is useful for declaratively describing the behavior of your application, from the individual components to the overall application logic.

xstate

Sometimes adding initial values through the jotai Provider is not what you want. Provider will create a whole new store with atom values

One way to initialize a state machine inside Jotai is to turn our initial `lightAtom` into a function `createLightAtom`. This function will take an `initial` property that we can pass to `createLightMachine` when we declare the function. We will then useEffect to initialize our lightMachine.

There is a small limitation with this pattern, the machine is initialized with it's default value and then over ridden with the value we pass in the effect. The initial render will use that default value while the second render will have the value we passed in.


Initialize a Xstate Machine with Jotai Atom in Atom Pattern

We currently have a machine that displays a circle of green. When you click it, it will cycle through green, yellow, and Red.

What if you wanted to pass XState initial values from Jotai, you'll need to use the `initialValues` prop on Jotai Provider and pass a list of pair (atom and value) to it.

To do this we'll refactor the creation of the lightMachine to be a function that accepts an atom as an initial value.

One note to be aware of is that this initial value will only be set when the XState machines instantiate.


Provide XState with Initial Values through Jotai Provider

Sometimes you need to display values in specific ways throughout your application based on the state that you are managing. The way to do this is to derive your state so you don't have to track multiple stateful items.

In Jotai, this is accomplished by creating an atom, getting the value from another atom that you are managing (in this case from Xstate), and using that value how you need it in your derived atom. This atom will be re-evaluated every time the managed state changes.

This pattern is great to use if you have complex state managed in something like Xstate but need a derived state value that is not strongly tied to that managed state. The pattern works the same for async and synchronous function calls as well as pulling in multiple atoms and libraries to use in your derived state.


Derive Jotai Atom State from Complex State Managed in Xstate 

Jotai has a primitive and flexible API, because of this it's up to you on how you manage your state within an atom. 

Sometimes your state is complex enough to warrant a sophisticated library for safer abstraction. This is where you can install xstate to your application and Jotai will work seamlessly with the state machines that you define using `atomWithMachine`.

This allows you to consume the machine like any other atom in your components with `useAtom`. 

As an added bonus, I'll show you how to use xstate's visualizer to develop and interact with your state machine in dev tools. 


Handle Complex State in Jotai with XState using atomWithMachine

In this course, Chris takes a README-driven approach to build out a Rust CLI that supports content authoring for a digital garden.

Specifically, you'll work through the first command for the CLI, writing files. You start by initializing a new Cargo binary crate through creating the `write` command that allows you to create files (and their contents) to the folder that you set. 

Step by step you'll learn about:
- Handling user input
- Error handling
- Rust Move semantics
- Rust Copy semantics
- Integration testing

...and more!

Rust is a systems programming language that runs blazingly fast, prevents segfaults, and guarantees thread safety.

rust

Creating a Digital Garden CLI with Rust

While we have `test_write_with_title`
which tests the garden CLI with a given
title flag, we can also set up additional
tests, such as for using a written title
in the document for the filename.

Copy/pasting the code from test one into
test two is a lot of duplication, and
setting up the fake editor isn't going
to change across tests, so let's abstract
the creation of the temporary directory,
the fake editor script path, and the
`Command` itself into a utility function.

The port is relatively straightforward,
with the only changes being that we cut
off the `cmd` modifications before the
`.arg` calls, and now have to return
the `cmd` and the `temp_dir` in a tuple.

We return the actual `Command` and `TempDir`,
yielding ownership to the calling function
because we have no further use for them here,
but the calling function will need to mutate
the `Command` more, and use `TempDir` to test.

```rust
fn setup_command() -> (Command, assert_fs::TempDir) {
    let temp_dir = assert_fs::TempDir::new().unwrap();

    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    cmd.env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .env("GARDEN_PATH", temp_dir.path());
    (cmd, temp_dir)
}
```

The new write tests are considerably shorter
now and focus mostly on which subcommand to
call, and what the user interaction with that
subcommand is.

```rust

fn test_write_with_title() {
    let (mut cmd, temp_dir) = setup_command();
    let assert = cmd
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("atitle.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}

fn test_write_with_written_title() {
    let (mut cmd, temp_dir) = setup_command();
    let assert = cmd
        .arg("write")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("testing.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}
```

Abstracting test utilities inside integration test files

We can print lines to the terminal and
ask the user for various input. So let's
make the interface a bit more usable by
using colored output.

We can do this by bringing an extension
trait for formatting into scope:
`OwoColorize`.

Extension traits are one-off traits that
are used to add functions to a type that
our crate doesn't own. A crate can create
the new trait, then implement the
functions defined by that trait on a type
the crate doesn't own and if we bring that
trait into scope, the type will get the
extra functions. In this case, `OwoColorize`
is used for adding color functions to
formatters like Display and Debug.

We'll start with `ask_for_filename`

```rust
use color_eyre::owo_colors::OwoColorize;

fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
        "{}",
        "\
Enter filename
> "
        .blue()
        .bold(),
    ))
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
    .map(|title| slug::slugify(title))
}
```

In `confirm_filename` we can use multiple
formatters to get different colors:

```rust
let result = rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
    "\
{} {}
Do you want a different title? (y/N): ",
    "current title:".green().bold(),
    raw_title,
))
.wrap_err("Failed to get input for y/n question")?;
```

Using owo_colors Extension Traits to colorize terminal output

`PathBuf` lets us check to see if a file
exists before writing to it, so we can
take advantage of that to make sure that
we don't overwrite a file that already
exists, even if the user has indicated
a title that would overwrite another file.

```
let mut i: usize = 0;
loop {
    let dest_filename = format!(
        "{}{}",
        filename,
        if i == 0 {
            "".to_string()
        } else {
            i.to_string()
        }
    );
    let mut dest = garden_path.join(dest_filename);
    dest.set_extension("md");
    if dest.exists() {
        i = i + 1;
    } else {
        fs::rename(garden_tmpfile, &dest)?;
        break;
    }
}
```

Checking for file existence with PathBuf to ensure unique filenames

We have been ignoring implementing tests for the write subcommand. Now is the time that we'll test the command we have been building.

We'll build out a fake editor script that our test will use to check if the command is functioning properly. We will then use `arg` to build the command as we would normally use it ourselves.

After writing the test, we'll see how to clean up after ourselves so that we aren't leaving testing artifacts leftover just from running a test.

---

How to integration test a cargo binary that calls
out to `EDITOR` for modifications and asks the
user for input.

First we'll create a fake editor script to use
instead of vim, etc.

`tests/fake_editor.sh` is a one-liner.

```shell
echo "testing" >> $1;
```

Then we'll write our test using `assert_cmd` to
build up a `Command` that points to the `garden`
binary in out `Cargo.toml`.

We grab the fake editor path script using
`std::env::current_dir()`, make sure the file
exists (which means we've grabbed the right
path), and spawn a new `Command` with the
`EDITOR` variable set to the fake editor
script. The equivalent call to our bin is

```shell
EDITOR=path/to/fake-editor.sh garden write -t atitle
```

And the rust code to execute.

```rust
fn test_write_with_title() {
    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    let assert = cmd
        .env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();
}
```

Note that we're asserting that the command
exited sucessfully, and that we're inputing
`N\n` to the bin's stdin, which responds to
a request for user input after the editor
closes.

Note that this doesn't actually test for
the resulting file existence, and also that
we're writing our files out directly into
our default digital garden! We can solve
this with `assert_fs` and `predicates`.

We'll bring in both preludes (a prelude is
a bunch of stuff the library author thinks
will be useful to have around all the time)
and create a new temporary directory.

We'll use the `GARDEN_PATH` environment
variable to pass the temporary directory in
to the `garden` bin and that's it, we've
added a temporary directory to our test.
No more polluting the default garden!

```rust
use assert_fs::prelude::*;
use predicates::prelude::*;

fn test_write_with_title() {
    let temp_dir = assert_fs::TempDir::new().unwrap();

    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    let assert = cmd
        .env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .env("GARDEN_PATH", temp_dir.path())
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("atitle.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}
```

Now that's enough, but we can also check
to make sure the file we expect to exist
actually exists. `temp_dir.child` gives
us the possible file, and we can assert
on that file with a test from `predicates`
that tests to make sure the file exists.

```rust
temp_dir
    .child("atitle.md")
    .assert(predicate::path::exists());
```

Using assert_fs and predicates to integration test with a real temporary file system

What user experience do we want for the
act of writing?

We have a few options, including letting
users write directly in the console or giving
them a prepared file that they can then open
and write in.

Writing directly in the console doesn't give
a user access to their text editor of choice.
Which means lacking autocomplete, syntax
highlighting, snippets, and other functionality.

Creating a file and handling the path back to
the user doesn't quite work for us either, as
that reduces the utility of the garden write
command to the equivalent of running `touch
filename.md`.

So for our use case, we'd ideally like to open
the user's preferred editing environment,
whatever that happens to be, then wait for them
to be done with the file before continuing.

Since we're working with a CLI tool, we
can safely assume that our users either
know how to, or are willingly to learn how
to, set environment variables. This means we
can use the `EDITOR` variable to select an
editor to use. This is the same way `git commit`
works.

---

In Rust, there is a crate that handles not only
`EDITOR`, but also various fallbacks per-platform.
We'll take advantage of [edit](https://crates.io/crates/edit)
to call out to the user's choice of editor.

The quick usage of edit allows us to call the
`edit::edit` function, and get the user's data.

```rust
pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    dbg!(garden_path, title);
    let template = "# ";
    let content_from_user = edit::edit(template).wrap_err("unable to read writing")?;
    dbg!(content_from_user);
    todo!()
}
```

This results in a filename that looks like:
`.tmpBy0Yun` "somewhere else" on the filesystem,
in a location the user would never reasonably
find it. Ideally, if anything went wrong, the
user would be able to take a look at the
in-progress tempfile they were just working on,
which should be in an easily discoverable place
like the garden path.

*We don't want to lose a user's work.*

Additionally, the tempfile doesn't have a file
extension, which means that the user's editor
will be less likely to recognize it as a
markdown file, so we want to add `.md` to the
filepath.

```rust
use color_eyre::{eyre::WrapErr, Result};
use edit::{edit_file, Builder};
use std::io::{Read, Write};
use std::path::PathBuf;

const TEMPLATE: &[u8; 2] = b"# ";

pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    let (mut file, filepath) = Builder::new()
        .suffix(".md")
        .rand_bytes(5)
        .tempfile_in(&garden_path)
        .wrap_err("Failed to create wip file")?
        .keep()
        .wrap_err("Failed to keep tempfile")?;
    file.write_all(TEMPLATE)?;
    // let the user write whatever they want in their favorite editor
    // before returning to the cli and finishing up
    edit_file(filepath)?;
    // Read the user's changes back from the file into a string
    let mut contents = String::new();
    file.read_to_string(&mut contents)?;

    dbg!(contents);
    todo!()
}
```

We will use the `edit::Builder` API to generate
a random tempfile to let the user write content
into. The suffix is going to be `.md` and the
filename will be 5 random bytes. We also put
the tempfile in the garden path, which ensures
a user will be able to find it if necessary.

`wrap_err` (which requires the `eyre::WrapErr`
trait in scope) wraps the potential error
resulting from these calls with additional context,
making the original error the source, and we can
keep chaining after that. We `keep` the tempfile,
which would otherwise be deleted when all handles
closed, because if anything goes wrong after the
user inputs data, we want to make sure we don't
lose that data.

After the file is created, we write our template
out to the file before passing control to the
user. This requires the `std::io::Write` trait
in scope. We use a const for the file template
because it won't change. To make the `TEMPLATE`
a const, we also need to give it a type, which
is a two element byte array. Change the string
to see how the byte array length is checked at
compile time.

Since we have access to the `file` already, we
can read the contents back into a string after
the user is done editing. This requires having
the `std::io::Read` trait in scope.

And now we've let the user write into a file
which will stick around as long as we need it
to, and importantly will stick around if any
errors happen in the execution of the program,
so we lose no user data and can remove the
temporary file at the end of the program
ourselves if all goes well.

Passing control to the user's favorite editor (such as VSCode) from the CLI

Given the potential `document_title` we now
want to ask the user if the title is still
what they want to use so that we can write
the file to disk. This will involve two
paths depending on if we have an existing
potential option or not.

We will need to use `ask_for_filename` in
`confirm_filename`, so we'll write that branch
first.

```rust
let filename = match document_title {
    Some(raw_title) => {
        // confirm_filename()?
        todo!()
    }
    None => ask_for_filename(),
};
```

`rprompt` allows us to ask for a small amount
of input from the user (compared to the  much
larger input possible by passing control to
the user's editor).

We'll use `rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr` to
get a response from the user, and `.wrap_err`
to add context to the error if anything goes
wrong.

```rust
fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(
        "\
Enter filename
> ",
    )
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
}
```

We'll use the same behavior for the first
part of `confirm_filename`. We'll also
need to use our first lifetime to account
for the shared reference argument.

`match` can match against multiple values
for the same branch, so we'll take advantage
of that to handle branches for Ns and Ys, as
well as the default case. If anything goes
wrong, such as someone inputting an "a",
we'll fall through using `loop` and ask again
until we get a usable answer

```rust
fn confirm_filename(raw_title: &str) -> Result<String> {
    loop {
        // prompt defaults to uppercase character in question
        // this is a convention, not a requirement enforced by
        // the code
        let result = rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
            "\
current title: `{}`
Do you want a different title? (y/N): ",
            raw_title,
        ))
        .wrap_err("Failed to get input for y/n question")?;

        match result.as_str() {
            "y" | "Y" => break ask_for_filename(),
            "n" | "N" | "" => {
                // the capital N in the prompt means "default",
                // so we handle "" as input here
                break Ok(slug::slugify(raw_title));
            }
            _ => {
                // ask again because something went wrong
            }
        };
    }
}
```

While filenames can technically have spaces
in them, we're going to slugify our filenames
like urls for a few reasons. One is that
when starting out, many programmers fail to
quote filename arguments in their bash scripts,
which results in filenames with spaces being
treated as separate arguments. Another is
that this is a digital garden CLI, and
digital gardens are often stored in git,
accessed from multiple file systems, as well
as from URLs. While strictly speaking we don't
need to slugify our filenames, we will here
so as to adhere to a safer set of characters.

```
cargo add slug
```

We'll map over the `Result` from `rprompt`
which allows us to operate on the internal
value if it's `Ok`.

```rust
fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(
        "\
Enter filename
> ",
    )
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
    .map(|title| slug::slugify(title))
}
```

We'll also use slugify in `confirm_filename`

```rust
match result.as_str() {
    "y" | "Y" => break ask_for_filename(),
    "n" | "N" | "" => {
        // the capital N in the prompt means "default",
        // so we handle "" as input here
        break Ok(slug::slugify(raw_title));
    }
    _ => {
        // ask again because something went wrong
    }
};
```

The fact that `confirm_filename` and
`ask_for_filename` have the same return type
is important because the branches of a `match`
need to return the same type.

Prompting the user for input with rprompt and loop

We want to build out functionality to let the user
write into a file in their garden. To do that, we
have to know the location of their garden.

We'll start by implementing a function to get the
default garden path.

```rust
fn get_default_garden_dir() -> Result<PathBuf> {
    let user_dirs = UserDirs::new().ok_or_else(|| eyre!("Could not find home directory"))?;
    Ok(user_dirs.home_dir().join(".garden"))
}
```

This uses the user's system directories via the
`directories` crate to find their home dir. We
then add `.garden` to the home dir for the default
garden.

Ideally, we would want the user to be able to
specify their garden path. Using structopt, we
can let them specify it as a short, long, or
env var.

In our README, we'll specify how this should work.

````

```shell
GARDEN_PATH=~/github/my-digital-garden garden write
garden -p ~/github/my-digital-garden write
garden --garden_path ~/github/my-digital-garden write
```
````

And in our `Opt` struct, we can tell structopt how to
handle it. Putting this in our `Opt` struct instead of
our `Command` enum make it a global flag that can be
specified for all subcommands.

```rust
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(parse(from_os_str), short = "p", long, env)]
    garden_path: Option<PathBuf>,

    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
```

structopt is only handling the user input, so in
`main()` we still need to fall back to the
default if the `garden_path` is not specified.

```rust
let garden_path = match opt.garden_path {
    Some(pathbuf) => Ok(pathbuf),
    None => get_default_garden_dir().wrap_err("`garden_path` was not supplied"),
}?;
```

if we force an `Err` in `get_default_garden_dir`
We can see how the wrapped errors end up stacking.

```
Error:
   0: `garden_path` was not supplied
   1: Could not find home directory
```

We'll also change the signature of `write` to
accept the pathbuf.

```
Command::Write { title } => write(garden_path, title),
```

Note that we need to import `PathBuf`. We can also
`dbg!` the garden path and title to see their
values.

```rust
use std::path::PathBuf;

pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    dbg!(garden_path, title);
    todo!()
}
```

Adding support for global flags that apply for all subcommands with structopt

In our subcommand match we'll add a new function called
`write` to handle our `Write` subcommand. We'll pass it
the argument title and we'll "import" it from a library
called `digital_garden`. 

```rust
use digital_garden::write;

fn main() -> Result<()> {
    color_eyre::install()?;

    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title } => write(title),
    }
}
```

To create this library, add a new section in `Cargo.toml`.
We can give our library a name and set which file to treat
as the entrypoint. `src/lib.rs` is the default file for
a library crate, but we can also be explicit about what we
want to happen.

```toml
[lib]
name = "digital_garden"
path = "src/lib.rs"
```

This leaves us with two crates, a binary crate, of which we
can have any amount, and a library crate, of which we can
only have 0 or 1.

We'll create the `src/lib.rs` file with the following
contents.

```rust
mod write;

pub use write::write;
```

Rust's module system is explicit, so when we write
`mod write`, we are saying that the library `digital_garden`
has a module `write`, such that the path to the module is
`digital_garden::write`.

In our case `digital_garden::write` corresponds to a file
at `src/write.rs`.

Secondly, the `pub use write::write` says that we have a
function called `write` in the module called `write` and
that the function will be exposed from lib publicly, so
people who have the `digital_garden` library installed
will be able to use the write function as
`digital_garden::write`.

In JavaScript the closest analogue is exporting a function
from another file that exports it.

```js
export { write } from './write.js';
```

By using use, we're shortening the public path to the write
function. A private module "write" with a function "write"
also exists at `digital_garden::write::write`. If you try
to use this path, Rust will tell you there is a private
module there.

Finally, in `src/write.rs`, we can write a public function
that matches the return type of our main function, since
we're using it as the return value from our match function.

We'll accept an `Option<String>` as an argument as well,
since that's what we expect from the cli arguments.

```rust
use color_eyre::Result;

pub fn write(_title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    todo!()
}
```

The purpose of creating this module path is because we
know that we're going to set up more modules for each
subcommand in the future, and we can control both the
placement of our code on disk, as well as the path users
will interact with to use our module.

Creating a library crate to support a Rust binary crate in the same package

After getting the user's input, we need to
figure out a filename to write the file out
as. We can either use the title the user
passed in, or we can try to use heuristics
to find a title from the markdown content.

We can combine the user's title from the cli
arguments (an `Option`) with the logic we
use as a heuristic for the markdown (also
an `Option`).

```rust
// use `title` if the user passed it in,
// otherwise try to find a heading in the markdown
let document_title = title.or_else(|| {
    contents
        .lines()
        .find(|v| v.starts_with("# "))
        // markdown headings are required to have `# ` with
        // at least one space
        .map(|maybe_line| maybe_line.trim_start_matches("# ").to_string())
});
```

`option.or_else()` returns the original
option if it is a `Some` value, or executes
the function to return a different `Option`
if not. So `document_title` is an
`Option<String>` either way and we've
covered all of the possible scenarios:

1. the user has passed in a title
2. the user has written content with a heading
3. the user has done neither of these

Which leaves us to our markdown heuristic.

Markdown headings are required to have `# `
with at least one space, so we can turn
`contents` into an iterator and `find` the
first line that starts with `# `.

If we find one, we want to trim `# ` off of
the heading to get just the heading content,
so we can use `map` to operate on the value
inside of the `Option` returned by `find` if
it exists.

```rust
contents
    .lines()
    .find(|v| v.starts_with("# "))
    .map(|maybe_line| maybe_line.trim_start_matches("# ").to_string())
```

Now this code works fine, but it exposes a bug
in our file handling.

If we `write_all` to the `file`, that moves the
internal cursor to the end of that content. So
when we run our code now, `contents` is
skipping the first `# ` bytes, which means our
heuristic will only find the second heading in
the file.

To fix this, we can bring in the `std::io::Seek`
trait, and seek to the beginning of the file.

```rust
let mut contents = String::new();
file.seek(SeekFrom::Start(0))?;
file.read_to_string(&mut contents)?;
```

Using the Option type in Rust to pick from multiple values that might not exist

We can match on `opt.cmd` to determine which `Command`
variants was called. This lets us specify the variants
as match criteria and also destructure the values out
to use them.

```rust
    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
    }
```

As written, we run into two issues with this code.
One is that we aren't using `title` yet. In
destructuring, we can use the placeholder (`_`) in our
[pattern](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html).

```
warning: unused variable: `title`
  --> src/main.rs:32:26
   |
32 |         Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
   |                          ^^^^^ help: try ignoring the field: `title: _`
   |
   = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default
```

```rust
fn main() -> Result<()> {
    color_eyre::install()?;

    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title: _ } => todo!(),
    }
}
```

The second issue is that the `opt` variable is moved
before we try to destructure it. If we look at the
compiler output before we fixed the `title` issue we
see the value use after move pointing at `title`
specifically.

```
error[E0382]: use of moved value
m  --> src/main.rs:32:26
   |
29 |     let opt = Opt::from_args();
   |         --- move occurs because `opt` has type `Opt`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
30 |     dbg!(opt);
   |     ---------- value moved here
31 |     match opt.cmd {
32 |         Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
   |                          ^^^^^ value used here after move
```

If we look at it after fixing the unused `title`,
we see the compiler point at `opt.cmd`.

```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `opt.cmd`
  --> src/main.rs:31:11
   |
29 |     let opt = Opt::from_args();
   |         --- move occurs because `opt` has type `Opt`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
30 |     dbg!(opt);
   |     ---------- value moved here
31 |     match opt.cmd {
   |           ^^^^^^^ value used here after move
```

This is because opt is moved into the `dbg` call because
it doesn't implement the `Copy` trait. Now, we could
implement or derive `Copy` for `Opt` if `Command` can
implement `Copy`, but we can not implement `Copy` for
`Command`. This is because `String` does not, and can not,
implement `Copy`, and we have a `String` in our `title`.

Without diving into the depths of `Copy`, [`Clone`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/clone/trait.Clone.html),
and allocation, there is something we have that already
implements `Copy`, so we don't need to.

Shared references implement `Copy`.

So instead of passing `opt` into `dbg!`, and thus using
move semantics (which are the default in Rust), we can
pass a shared reference in: `dgb!(&opt)` which lets us
use copy semantics.

The difference between move semantics and copy semantics
in this case is that we can access `opt` after passing it
to `dbg!`.

Under the hood, both a copy and a move can result in bits
being copied in memory, although this is sometimes
optimized away. -- [Copy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html)

```rust
fn main() -> Result<()> {
    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title: _ } => todo!(),
    }
}
```

Matching structopt commands and using Rust values after move

Cargo allows us to execute a few different kinds of tests,
including integration and unit. For now we'll talk about
integration tests for our CLI. Integration tests
live in `/tests` and only have access to the public
interface of a crate.

In this case, we'll run the `garden` binary using
`assert_cmd` and assert various things about the
execution and output. For example, that the binary
exits successfully and that stderr has no output.

`cargo test` allows us to run all tests.

To restrict the number of tests that run to only the two
that work, we can use `cargo test help` to restrict
cargo to only running tests that match the keyword "help",
or use `#[ignore]` on a test we want to ignore.

The third test will be ignored because we have yet to
build out our functionality.

Integration testing Cargo binaries with assert_cmd

The StructOpt crate allows us to derive our human person functionality from our Struct definitions. 

We will create a `structop` for our `write` subcommand that will take a short and long flag for our `title` argument

---

```
cargo add structopt
```

structopt allows us to derive argument parsing functionality from our
structs. The name is a play on `struct Opt {}`. To do this we need to
`derive(StructOpt)` on our struct. In this case we have a subcommand,
so we'll set up one of the fields on the `Opt` struct to be a
`structopt(subcommand)`. This subcommand value will be an enum,
indicating that only one subcommand can be used at a time.

structopt also gives us tools to specify one of three argument types:

* positional
* short
* long

By default every argument is a positional argument, which means that in
this case if we left it as-is, the CLI would function as

```
garden write my-title
```

We want to use a flag, so we'll use structopt to generate short and long
flags for the title argument with `structopt(short, long)`. That gives
the use the option of `-t` and `--title` to specify a title.

structopt also contains some type processing, so all we need to do is
specify that title is an optional string and the flags will become
optional. That is: a user can specify or not specify a title.

```rust
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
enum Command {
    Write {
        #[structopt(short, long)]
        title: Option<String>,
    },
}
```

After setting up `struct Opt`, we can parse the args and use
the dbg!() macro to print them to the console so we can see
what they look like.

```rust
let opt = Opt::from_args();
dbg!(opt);
```

To do that we also need to `derive(Debug)` in addition to
structopt on both the enum and the struct.

Given input like

```
garden write
```

We will see the following output.

```rust
[src/main.rs:21] opt = Opt {
    cmd: Write {
        title: None,
    },
}
```

We can choose to `cargo build` and then `./target/debug/garden write`
or we can use `cargo run -- write`. The `--` ensures that our arguments
get passed to the CLI we're building and not `cargo run`. This is
especially relevant when passing something like `--help`.

Setting up git-like subcommands using structopt

if we run `cargo run -- --help`, we can see that structopt
thinks the name of our binary is still the package name.
We can change that with another attribute macro on our
struct.

```
digital-garden 0.1.0

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write
```

Also notice that in the help text the `help` subcommand
has some helpful output while `write` has none:

```
garden 0.1.0

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write
```

There are a number of places we can put doc comments.
We can write on the `Opt` struct for global information
about the CLI.

We can also write on each subcommand or even the options
for each subcommand.

```
/// A CLI for the growing and curation of a digital garden
///
/// Visit https://www.rustadventure.rs/garden for more!
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
enum Command {
    /// write something in your garden
    ///
    /// This command will open your $EDITOR, wait for you
    /// to write something, and then save the file to your
    /// garden
    Write {
        /// Optionally set a title for what you are going to write about
        #[structopt(short, long)]
        title: Option<String>,
    },
}
```

Each of these results in documentation going to the relevant
place in the CLI help text. Note especially that the first
line of doc comment for subcommands is shown as "short"
help text, while the full text is reserved for running
`--help` directly on the subcommand.

```
❯ cargo run
garden 0.1.0
A CLI for the growing and curation of a digital garden

Visit https://www.rustadventure.rs/garden for more!

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write    write something in your garden
```

```
❯ cargo run -- write --help
garden-write 0.1.0
write something in your garden

This command will open your $EDITOR, wait for you to write something, and then save the file to your garden

USAGE:
    garden write [OPTIONS]

FLAGS:
    -h, --help
            Prints help information

    -V, --version
            Prints version information

OPTIONS:
    -t, --title <title>
            Optionally set a title for what you are going to write about
```

Also note that `-h` and `--help` are *not* the same thing when it comes to structopt.

Documenting and writing helptext for Structopt CLI commands and flags

Right now we are using the `todo!()` macro which is great for simulating when our program panics. The error message that we get can be improved upon.

We will look at color-eyre that will allow us to handle the errors we receive to be more visual and human-readable. 

---
The `todo!` macro is useful and it also exposes what
happens if our application panics.

```
thread 'main' panicked at 'not yet implemented', src/main.rs:2:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```

This could be both more readable and contain more information
while also being colored using [color_eyre](https://docs.rs/color-eyre/0.5.10/color_eyre/).

```
The application panicked (crashed).
Message:  not yet implemented
Location: src/main.rs:5

Backtrace omitted.
Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 environment variable to display it.
Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full to include source snippets.
```

We'll use [cargo-edit](https://crates.io/crates/cargo-edit)
to add the package to our Cargo.toml.

```
cargo install cargo-edit
cargo add color_eyre
```

`main` can return `Result`, so we'll use `color_eyre`'s
`Result` as our return value and `color_eyre::install` to
install the default panic and error reporting hooks.
`install` returns a `Result` so we can use `?` to handle
any errors if necessary.

We haven't shown off everything that color_eyre is capable
of. In addition to panic handling, color_eyre allows us to
track additional information in the context of our errors
and include suggestions by taking advantage of distributed
[tracing](https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing) infrastructure.

We'll see more of how this helps as we build out the CLI.

Using color_eyre and distributed tracing to yield better error messages to the user

We'll replace the `println!` macro with a call to `todo!`, which has
the additional benefit of type-checking so we won't need to finish
anything with `todo!` in the expression. Note that if we call a function
with `todo!`, we do get the `panic!` behavior.

We do have two other options for achieving the same thing,
`unimplemented!` and `panic!`. All three of these options functionally
do the same thing: they crash the program immediately.

We aren't using `panic!` because `panic!` should be used when a program
reaches an unrecoverable state. We don't have an unrecoverable state
so much as a piece of the program we intend to work on later.

For similar reasons, we aren't using `unimplemented!` because we want
to convey that this is something to work on while `unimplemented!`
doesn't necessarily mean that we intend to work on it.

Using the todo macro to typecheck unwritten code that will be implemented in the future

In this lesson, you'll discover how to style View Transitions using CSS pseudo-selectors to create custom animation effects. We'll transform the default cross-fade into a smooth slide transition by targeting the ::view-transition-old and ::view-transition-new pseudo-elements. You'll learn how these powerful selectors give you precise control over your transition animations, allowing you to create more engaging and personalized user experiences with just a few lines of CSS.

Customize View Transitions with CSS Using view-transition-old and view-transition-new

In this lesson, you'll learn how to implement smooth state transitions in your web applications using the browser's built-in View Transitions API. We'll create a simple example that demonstrates how to animate between different text states with just a few lines of code - no external libraries required. This powerful native API makes it easy to add professional-looking transitions to your user interface, enhancing the user experience with minimal effort.

Create Smooth UI Transitions with the Native View Transitions API

I've been using Cursor for a very long time and their "Agent" feature in Composer is fairly new, so I'm still getting used to it. But since Windsurf recently got onto the stage with their Cascade agent, they've slowly been gaining the mind share on the UX for coding agents. I decided to put them to the test by putting Windsurf and Cursor on the exact same screen side by side trying to accomplish the same task and to see which workflow I would prefer. I've been a diehard Cursor user for over a year now, so it's going to take a lot for me to switch to a different IDE. But I just have to say, even from this simple demo, Windsurf is looking pretty nice.

This lesson is just going to walk through creating a CLI using both tools to print out inspirational quotes and to explore how they approach the step-by-step of installing packages and running commands and setting up all the files we need to get this running.

Windsurf Cascade vs. Cursor Composer Agent Side-by-Side Comparison

This TypeScript tutorial explains how to use generics, allowing for different types to be passed as arguments. It discusses the use of shorthand syntax in generics and illustrates with examples. This method is useful for library creation, providing type safety and control to the user.

```typescript
interface PhotoMetadata<T> {
  title: string;
  takenAt: Date;
  customData: T;
}

// Function that processes a photo with custom metadata
function processPhoto<T>(photo: PhotoMetadata<T>): {
  processedTitle: string;
  daysSinceCapture: number;
  customDataSummary: T;
} {
  const today = new Date();
  const daysSinceCapture = Math.floor(
    (today.getTime() - photo.takenAt.getTime()) / (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24)
  );

  return {
    processedTitle: photo.title.toUpperCase(),
    daysSinceCapture,
    customDataSummary: photo.customData
  };
}

// Example usage with different custom data shapes
type CameraSettings = {
  iso: number;
  aperture: string;
  shutterSpeed: string;
}

type LocationData = {
  latitude: number;
  longitude: number;
  locationName: string;
}

// Using with camera settings
const photoWithCamera: PhotoMetadata<CameraSettings> = {
  title: "Sunset at beach",
  takenAt: new Date('2024-01-15'),
  customData: {
    iso: 100,
    aperture: "f/2.8",
    shutterSpeed: "1/1000"
  }
};

// Using with location data
const photoWithLocation: PhotoMetadata<LocationData> = {
  title: "Mountain vista",
  takenAt: new Date('2024-02-01'),
  customData: {
    latitude: 45.5231,
    longitude: -122.6765,
    locationName: "Mount Hood"
  }
};

const processedCameraPhoto = processPhoto(photoWithCamera);
const processedLocationPhoto = processPhoto(photoWithLocation);

processedCameraPhoto.customDataSummary.iso
processedLocationPhoto.customDataSummary.longitude

```

Basic Explanation of Typescript Generics

A very basic explanation of generic function arguments

I've been using Cursor as my primary editor for over a year now, but recently I've heard wonderful things about Windsurf AI Agent features. I decided to record myself building out something I've always wanted to make, but never made the time for.

In this lesson, I demonstrate how to leverage Windsurf's powerful agent process to create a fun word-guessing game inspired by Heads Up. Watch as I build an interactive application featuring category selection and word navigation, complete with data hosting on GitHub Gists and deployment to GitHub Pages - all in under 30 minutes (before editing the lesson down to 12 minutes)!

What makes this project particularly exciting is how Windsurf eliminates the typical friction points of development. While this game was always on my project wishlist, the overhead of setup, configuration, and deployment made it hard to justify the time investment. Windsurf's agent process handles all these pain points seamlessly, from managing URLs to orchestrating deployment.

This lesson perfectly showcases how AI agents can help developers bring their backlog of project ideas to life, transforming what would typically be time-consuming tasks into efficient, enjoyable development experiences.

Build a Word Game with Windsurf's Cascade AI Agent



Discover how to harness the power of Cursor IDE's Composer Agent feature to optimize your code. In this lesson, you'll witness an AI agent doing all the work to generate test suites, implement performance benchmarks, and create optimized function variations - all without writing a single line of code. You'll learn how to validate performance improvements through data-driven benchmarking, ensuring that optimizations are backed by concrete metrics rather than speculation. This hands-on demonstration showcases a groundbreaking approach to automated function development that combines the precision of test-driven development with the efficiency of AI-powered optimization.


Agent-Driven Development in Cursor: Testing, Benchmarking, and Optimizing Functions

This course is aimed for using `zod` effectively in projects based on TypeScript (both browser and node.js). The benefits you gain with this course is not just simply coding, but also understanding when/why/how should you perform runtime validation.

`zod` is the missing piece to TypeScript's capabilities, which can guarantee type-safety only in compile-time.

`zod` can be used whenever the compiler cannot guarantee what happens in runtime. And... it's a very frequent usecase, such as HTTP calls, websockets, etc.

In this course you get quickly up and running by:
1. using `zod` with primitives and objects
2. adapting `zod` quickly to existing projects thanks to automatic generators
3. changing the strategy frm type-first to schema-first
4. using error-throwing `parse` or non-error-throwing `safeParse` basing on your needs
5. applying `zod` to the most common usecase - validating API responses
6. handling errors the most convenient way (out of many!)

Take advantage of runtime validation with `zod`. Take advantage of the detailed lessons in this course 🔥

Effective Runtime Type Checks with Zod


Cursor can now automatically run commands in the terminal and walk step-by-step towards building out your entire project. You give it a goal, then it will suggest the commands you need to run and the files that you need to create and you can work with it to achieve what you're building. This lesson does a quick walkthough of using a Cursor Agent to build a project from scratch and guide it along the way. Cursor Agents definitely feel like a sneak peek at the future of programming!

Cursor Agents Initial Impressions - Allow an AI to Build Your Entire Project

Mock Service Worker is an API mocking library that allows you to write client-agnostic mocks and reuse them across any frameworks, tools, and environments.



Mocking WebSocket APIs with Mock Service Worker


While using anonymous functions might seem convenient, they can create difficulties when trying to identify performance bottlenecks during profiling. This lesson will demonstrate how named functions make it easier to pinpoint and address performance issues, ultimately leading to more efficient and debuggable code. Learning this practice will greatly improve your ability to locate and fix performance issues in complex projects.

Search

Search Results