Learn Http, Rust and Scikit-learn

Astro is a flexible web framework that allows you to build fast websites to suit your needs.

By default, Astro will build your site using Static Site Generation (SSG). This means the data in your site is loaded at build time so that the end-user gets served static pages that load quickly.

While Astro defaults this way, it also has Server-Side Rendering (SSR) that you can enable if you have more serverful needs in your application.

Along similar lines, Astro utilizes HTML and the browser as a default but when you need more flexibility you can opt into an Astro Island. Islands use React, Vue, Angular, or any frontend JavaScript framework you are used to enhance the user experience in your site.

astro

Now that we have our database set up, we need to use it!

On our blog post page, we have a likes button waiting for us to implement the likes feature. On page load, we'll make a fetch call to a `/api/likes/[slug].ts` GET end point to return the number of likes for the page. 

Similarly, when someone clicks the like button we want to send a POST request to that same endpoint.

On the server side we will set up `GET` and `POST` handlers to implement this functionality. In those functions we'll use Drizzle to return the likes for that blog post and in the case of a `POST` we'll create a record if it doesn't exist or increment a like if it does and return.

Astro API endpoints utilize browser `Response` API so you'll get a chance to handle returning different status's based on the data present.

Create Astro API Endpoints to Get and Update Database Records using Drizzle ORM

The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems. It is a generic, stateless, protocol which can be used for many tasks beyond its use for hypertext, such as name servers and distributed object management systems, through extension of its request methods, error codes and headers.

http

We're adding Github authorization to our client app

Create a function that is called on window load. In that function store the parameters that get sent over to the Github auth server. 

In our query params, we will set the response_type parameter to "code" in order to ask the auth server for a code. Asking for a code from the auth server is more secure than asking for the access token through a browser

Finally, create a URL from the params and an authorization endpoint. Using a query selector select an anchor tag and set the href attribute to the URL that you created.

Add GitHub Authorization to an OAuth Client App

Express is a minimal and flexible Node.js web application framework that provides a robust set of features for web and mobile applications.

express

We'll create our client-server using the `express` and `cors` packages

Express will be used to create our HTTP application. We'll need it to post to our endpoints and listen to our port.

We need the `cors` package to make cross-origin requests since the front-end will be a different origin than the server.

Create an OAuth Client-Server for code/token exchange

We'll be parsing the authorization code sent in our query before sending it to the server.

We do this by creating a function that parses our query and retrieves the code parameter. If we find a code in the query we send the code to our server by using `fetch` to make a `POST` request. In the body of the request we send the code and the state in stringified JSON.

Once we make the request we can await a response and store its JSON data (the auth token) in a variable. In a real application, we might also redirect to the homepage or the page the user was just on.

Parse for the Auth Code in a Query before Sending It to a Server

We're going to refactor some of our HTTP application code in order to create the ability to exchange the code inside our HTTP request for a token. 

We can do this by creating a function that takes the code from a request and posts a query that contains our client id and secret to our token endpoint. We then await a response, parse the data from the response, and then return the parsed data.

Exchange Auth Code in a Request for an Access Token

We're going to fetch a user with that token we exchanged the code parameter for in the previous lesson. 

All we have to do is make a fetch request to the `/user` endpoint with an Authorization header that contains the token and then return the data. Like this ``Authorization: `Bearer ${token}``

Fetch Protected Data from a Resource Server with an Access Token

 Every developer who has attempted to demystify OAuth 2.0 must be presented with mind-bugging complicated flow diagrams. It becomes worse when you try to understand all the terminologies of OAuth 2.0 and Open ID protocols.

There is no getting around the OAuth 2.0 flow being complicated with back and forth between your browser, the service you are authenticating with, and the application you want to access. 

This course gets straight to the point without any application code distracting you from the core takeaway -- You will learn how to authenticate and authorize yourself using GitHub as your Auth Server.

We'll first cover the OAuth 2.0 flow for authentication and then integrate the Open ID protocol for authorization.

[**LIVE EVENT**: Register here for a live webinar with Christian on OAuth.](https://egghead.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Sxy1FEcoTea8UA6F7EDzLw) Bring any questions you have from taking this course!

JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.

Add Github Login to Your Web App with OAuth 2.0

In this course, Chris takes a README-driven approach to build out a Rust CLI that supports content authoring for a digital garden.

Specifically, you'll work through the first command for the CLI, writing files. You start by initializing a new Cargo binary crate through creating the `write` command that allows you to create files (and their contents) to the folder that you set. 

Step by step you'll learn about:
- Handling user input
- Error handling
- Rust Move semantics
- Rust Copy semantics
- Integration testing

...and more!

Rust is a systems programming language that runs blazingly fast, prevents segfaults, and guarantees thread safety.

rust

Creating a Digital Garden CLI with Rust

While we have `test_write_with_title`
which tests the garden CLI with a given
title flag, we can also set up additional
tests, such as for using a written title
in the document for the filename.

Copy/pasting the code from test one into
test two is a lot of duplication, and
setting up the fake editor isn't going
to change across tests, so let's abstract
the creation of the temporary directory,
the fake editor script path, and the
`Command` itself into a utility function.

The port is relatively straightforward,
with the only changes being that we cut
off the `cmd` modifications before the
`.arg` calls, and now have to return
the `cmd` and the `temp_dir` in a tuple.

We return the actual `Command` and `TempDir`,
yielding ownership to the calling function
because we have no further use for them here,
but the calling function will need to mutate
the `Command` more, and use `TempDir` to test.

```rust
fn setup_command() -> (Command, assert_fs::TempDir) {
    let temp_dir = assert_fs::TempDir::new().unwrap();

    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    cmd.env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .env("GARDEN_PATH", temp_dir.path());
    (cmd, temp_dir)
}
```

The new write tests are considerably shorter
now and focus mostly on which subcommand to
call, and what the user interaction with that
subcommand is.

```rust

fn test_write_with_title() {
    let (mut cmd, temp_dir) = setup_command();
    let assert = cmd
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("atitle.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}

fn test_write_with_written_title() {
    let (mut cmd, temp_dir) = setup_command();
    let assert = cmd
        .arg("write")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("testing.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}
```

Abstracting test utilities inside integration test files

We can print lines to the terminal and
ask the user for various input. So let's
make the interface a bit more usable by
using colored output.

We can do this by bringing an extension
trait for formatting into scope:
`OwoColorize`.

Extension traits are one-off traits that
are used to add functions to a type that
our crate doesn't own. A crate can create
the new trait, then implement the
functions defined by that trait on a type
the crate doesn't own and if we bring that
trait into scope, the type will get the
extra functions. In this case, `OwoColorize`
is used for adding color functions to
formatters like Display and Debug.

We'll start with `ask_for_filename`

```rust
use color_eyre::owo_colors::OwoColorize;

fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
        "{}",
        "\
Enter filename
> "
        .blue()
        .bold(),
    ))
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
    .map(|title| slug::slugify(title))
}
```

In `confirm_filename` we can use multiple
formatters to get different colors:

```rust
let result = rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
    "\
{} {}
Do you want a different title? (y/N): ",
    "current title:".green().bold(),
    raw_title,
))
.wrap_err("Failed to get input for y/n question")?;
```

Using owo_colors Extension Traits to colorize terminal output

`PathBuf` lets us check to see if a file
exists before writing to it, so we can
take advantage of that to make sure that
we don't overwrite a file that already
exists, even if the user has indicated
a title that would overwrite another file.

```
let mut i: usize = 0;
loop {
    let dest_filename = format!(
        "{}{}",
        filename,
        if i == 0 {
            "".to_string()
        } else {
            i.to_string()
        }
    );
    let mut dest = garden_path.join(dest_filename);
    dest.set_extension("md");
    if dest.exists() {
        i = i + 1;
    } else {
        fs::rename(garden_tmpfile, &dest)?;
        break;
    }
}
```

Checking for file existence with PathBuf to ensure unique filenames

We have been ignoring implementing tests for the write subcommand. Now is the time that we'll test the command we have been building.

We'll build out a fake editor script that our test will use to check if the command is functioning properly. We will then use `arg` to build the command as we would normally use it ourselves.

After writing the test, we'll see how to clean up after ourselves so that we aren't leaving testing artifacts leftover just from running a test.

---

How to integration test a cargo binary that calls
out to `EDITOR` for modifications and asks the
user for input.

First we'll create a fake editor script to use
instead of vim, etc.

`tests/fake_editor.sh` is a one-liner.

```shell
echo "testing" >> $1;
```

Then we'll write our test using `assert_cmd` to
build up a `Command` that points to the `garden`
binary in out `Cargo.toml`.

We grab the fake editor path script using
`std::env::current_dir()`, make sure the file
exists (which means we've grabbed the right
path), and spawn a new `Command` with the
`EDITOR` variable set to the fake editor
script. The equivalent call to our bin is

```shell
EDITOR=path/to/fake-editor.sh garden write -t atitle
```

And the rust code to execute.

```rust
fn test_write_with_title() {
    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    let assert = cmd
        .env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();
}
```

Note that we're asserting that the command
exited sucessfully, and that we're inputing
`N\n` to the bin's stdin, which responds to
a request for user input after the editor
closes.

Note that this doesn't actually test for
the resulting file existence, and also that
we're writing our files out directly into
our default digital garden! We can solve
this with `assert_fs` and `predicates`.

We'll bring in both preludes (a prelude is
a bunch of stuff the library author thinks
will be useful to have around all the time)
and create a new temporary directory.

We'll use the `GARDEN_PATH` environment
variable to pass the temporary directory in
to the `garden` bin and that's it, we've
added a temporary directory to our test.
No more polluting the default garden!

```rust
use assert_fs::prelude::*;
use predicates::prelude::*;

fn test_write_with_title() {
    let temp_dir = assert_fs::TempDir::new().unwrap();

    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    let assert = cmd
        .env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .env("GARDEN_PATH", temp_dir.path())
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("atitle.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}
```

Now that's enough, but we can also check
to make sure the file we expect to exist
actually exists. `temp_dir.child` gives
us the possible file, and we can assert
on that file with a test from `predicates`
that tests to make sure the file exists.

```rust
temp_dir
    .child("atitle.md")
    .assert(predicate::path::exists());
```

Using assert_fs and predicates to integration test with a real temporary file system

What user experience do we want for the
act of writing?

We have a few options, including letting
users write directly in the console or giving
them a prepared file that they can then open
and write in.

Writing directly in the console doesn't give
a user access to their text editor of choice.
Which means lacking autocomplete, syntax
highlighting, snippets, and other functionality.

Creating a file and handling the path back to
the user doesn't quite work for us either, as
that reduces the utility of the garden write
command to the equivalent of running `touch
filename.md`.

So for our use case, we'd ideally like to open
the user's preferred editing environment,
whatever that happens to be, then wait for them
to be done with the file before continuing.

Since we're working with a CLI tool, we
can safely assume that our users either
know how to, or are willingly to learn how
to, set environment variables. This means we
can use the `EDITOR` variable to select an
editor to use. This is the same way `git commit`
works.

---

In Rust, there is a crate that handles not only
`EDITOR`, but also various fallbacks per-platform.
We'll take advantage of [edit](https://crates.io/crates/edit)
to call out to the user's choice of editor.

The quick usage of edit allows us to call the
`edit::edit` function, and get the user's data.

```rust
pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    dbg!(garden_path, title);
    let template = "# ";
    let content_from_user = edit::edit(template).wrap_err("unable to read writing")?;
    dbg!(content_from_user);
    todo!()
}
```

This results in a filename that looks like:
`.tmpBy0Yun` "somewhere else" on the filesystem,
in a location the user would never reasonably
find it. Ideally, if anything went wrong, the
user would be able to take a look at the
in-progress tempfile they were just working on,
which should be in an easily discoverable place
like the garden path.

*We don't want to lose a user's work.*

Additionally, the tempfile doesn't have a file
extension, which means that the user's editor
will be less likely to recognize it as a
markdown file, so we want to add `.md` to the
filepath.

```rust
use color_eyre::{eyre::WrapErr, Result};
use edit::{edit_file, Builder};
use std::io::{Read, Write};
use std::path::PathBuf;

const TEMPLATE: &[u8; 2] = b"# ";

pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    let (mut file, filepath) = Builder::new()
        .suffix(".md")
        .rand_bytes(5)
        .tempfile_in(&garden_path)
        .wrap_err("Failed to create wip file")?
        .keep()
        .wrap_err("Failed to keep tempfile")?;
    file.write_all(TEMPLATE)?;
    // let the user write whatever they want in their favorite editor
    // before returning to the cli and finishing up
    edit_file(filepath)?;
    // Read the user's changes back from the file into a string
    let mut contents = String::new();
    file.read_to_string(&mut contents)?;

    dbg!(contents);
    todo!()
}
```

We will use the `edit::Builder` API to generate
a random tempfile to let the user write content
into. The suffix is going to be `.md` and the
filename will be 5 random bytes. We also put
the tempfile in the garden path, which ensures
a user will be able to find it if necessary.

`wrap_err` (which requires the `eyre::WrapErr`
trait in scope) wraps the potential error
resulting from these calls with additional context,
making the original error the source, and we can
keep chaining after that. We `keep` the tempfile,
which would otherwise be deleted when all handles
closed, because if anything goes wrong after the
user inputs data, we want to make sure we don't
lose that data.

After the file is created, we write our template
out to the file before passing control to the
user. This requires the `std::io::Write` trait
in scope. We use a const for the file template
because it won't change. To make the `TEMPLATE`
a const, we also need to give it a type, which
is a two element byte array. Change the string
to see how the byte array length is checked at
compile time.

Since we have access to the `file` already, we
can read the contents back into a string after
the user is done editing. This requires having
the `std::io::Read` trait in scope.

And now we've let the user write into a file
which will stick around as long as we need it
to, and importantly will stick around if any
errors happen in the execution of the program,
so we lose no user data and can remove the
temporary file at the end of the program
ourselves if all goes well.

Passing control to the user's favorite editor (such as VSCode) from the CLI

Given the potential `document_title` we now
want to ask the user if the title is still
what they want to use so that we can write
the file to disk. This will involve two
paths depending on if we have an existing
potential option or not.

We will need to use `ask_for_filename` in
`confirm_filename`, so we'll write that branch
first.

```rust
let filename = match document_title {
    Some(raw_title) => {
        // confirm_filename()?
        todo!()
    }
    None => ask_for_filename(),
};
```

`rprompt` allows us to ask for a small amount
of input from the user (compared to the  much
larger input possible by passing control to
the user's editor).

We'll use `rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr` to
get a response from the user, and `.wrap_err`
to add context to the error if anything goes
wrong.

```rust
fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(
        "\
Enter filename
> ",
    )
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
}
```

We'll use the same behavior for the first
part of `confirm_filename`. We'll also
need to use our first lifetime to account
for the shared reference argument.

`match` can match against multiple values
for the same branch, so we'll take advantage
of that to handle branches for Ns and Ys, as
well as the default case. If anything goes
wrong, such as someone inputting an "a",
we'll fall through using `loop` and ask again
until we get a usable answer

```rust
fn confirm_filename(raw_title: &str) -> Result<String> {
    loop {
        // prompt defaults to uppercase character in question
        // this is a convention, not a requirement enforced by
        // the code
        let result = rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
            "\
current title: `{}`
Do you want a different title? (y/N): ",
            raw_title,
        ))
        .wrap_err("Failed to get input for y/n question")?;

        match result.as_str() {
            "y" | "Y" => break ask_for_filename(),
            "n" | "N" | "" => {
                // the capital N in the prompt means "default",
                // so we handle "" as input here
                break Ok(slug::slugify(raw_title));
            }
            _ => {
                // ask again because something went wrong
            }
        };
    }
}
```

While filenames can technically have spaces
in them, we're going to slugify our filenames
like urls for a few reasons. One is that
when starting out, many programmers fail to
quote filename arguments in their bash scripts,
which results in filenames with spaces being
treated as separate arguments. Another is
that this is a digital garden CLI, and
digital gardens are often stored in git,
accessed from multiple file systems, as well
as from URLs. While strictly speaking we don't
need to slugify our filenames, we will here
so as to adhere to a safer set of characters.

```
cargo add slug
```

We'll map over the `Result` from `rprompt`
which allows us to operate on the internal
value if it's `Ok`.

```rust
fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(
        "\
Enter filename
> ",
    )
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
    .map(|title| slug::slugify(title))
}
```

We'll also use slugify in `confirm_filename`

```rust
match result.as_str() {
    "y" | "Y" => break ask_for_filename(),
    "n" | "N" | "" => {
        // the capital N in the prompt means "default",
        // so we handle "" as input here
        break Ok(slug::slugify(raw_title));
    }
    _ => {
        // ask again because something went wrong
    }
};
```

The fact that `confirm_filename` and
`ask_for_filename` have the same return type
is important because the branches of a `match`
need to return the same type.

Prompting the user for input with rprompt and loop

We want to build out functionality to let the user
write into a file in their garden. To do that, we
have to know the location of their garden.

We'll start by implementing a function to get the
default garden path.

```rust
fn get_default_garden_dir() -> Result<PathBuf> {
    let user_dirs = UserDirs::new().ok_or_else(|| eyre!("Could not find home directory"))?;
    Ok(user_dirs.home_dir().join(".garden"))
}
```

This uses the user's system directories via the
`directories` crate to find their home dir. We
then add `.garden` to the home dir for the default
garden.

Ideally, we would want the user to be able to
specify their garden path. Using structopt, we
can let them specify it as a short, long, or
env var.

In our README, we'll specify how this should work.

````

```shell
GARDEN_PATH=~/github/my-digital-garden garden write
garden -p ~/github/my-digital-garden write
garden --garden_path ~/github/my-digital-garden write
```
````

And in our `Opt` struct, we can tell structopt how to
handle it. Putting this in our `Opt` struct instead of
our `Command` enum make it a global flag that can be
specified for all subcommands.

```rust
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(parse(from_os_str), short = "p", long, env)]
    garden_path: Option<PathBuf>,

    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
```

structopt is only handling the user input, so in
`main()` we still need to fall back to the
default if the `garden_path` is not specified.

```rust
let garden_path = match opt.garden_path {
    Some(pathbuf) => Ok(pathbuf),
    None => get_default_garden_dir().wrap_err("`garden_path` was not supplied"),
}?;
```

if we force an `Err` in `get_default_garden_dir`
We can see how the wrapped errors end up stacking.

```
Error:
   0: `garden_path` was not supplied
   1: Could not find home directory
```

We'll also change the signature of `write` to
accept the pathbuf.

```
Command::Write { title } => write(garden_path, title),
```

Note that we need to import `PathBuf`. We can also
`dbg!` the garden path and title to see their
values.

```rust
use std::path::PathBuf;

pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    dbg!(garden_path, title);
    todo!()
}
```

Adding support for global flags that apply for all subcommands with structopt

In our subcommand match we'll add a new function called
`write` to handle our `Write` subcommand. We'll pass it
the argument title and we'll "import" it from a library
called `digital_garden`. 

```rust
use digital_garden::write;

fn main() -> Result<()> {
    color_eyre::install()?;

    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title } => write(title),
    }
}
```

To create this library, add a new section in `Cargo.toml`.
We can give our library a name and set which file to treat
as the entrypoint. `src/lib.rs` is the default file for
a library crate, but we can also be explicit about what we
want to happen.

```toml
[lib]
name = "digital_garden"
path = "src/lib.rs"
```

This leaves us with two crates, a binary crate, of which we
can have any amount, and a library crate, of which we can
only have 0 or 1.

We'll create the `src/lib.rs` file with the following
contents.

```rust
mod write;

pub use write::write;
```

Rust's module system is explicit, so when we write
`mod write`, we are saying that the library `digital_garden`
has a module `write`, such that the path to the module is
`digital_garden::write`.

In our case `digital_garden::write` corresponds to a file
at `src/write.rs`.

Secondly, the `pub use write::write` says that we have a
function called `write` in the module called `write` and
that the function will be exposed from lib publicly, so
people who have the `digital_garden` library installed
will be able to use the write function as
`digital_garden::write`.

In JavaScript the closest analogue is exporting a function
from another file that exports it.

```js
export { write } from './write.js';
```

By using use, we're shortening the public path to the write
function. A private module "write" with a function "write"
also exists at `digital_garden::write::write`. If you try
to use this path, Rust will tell you there is a private
module there.

Finally, in `src/write.rs`, we can write a public function
that matches the return type of our main function, since
we're using it as the return value from our match function.

We'll accept an `Option<String>` as an argument as well,
since that's what we expect from the cli arguments.

```rust
use color_eyre::Result;

pub fn write(_title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    todo!()
}
```

The purpose of creating this module path is because we
know that we're going to set up more modules for each
subcommand in the future, and we can control both the
placement of our code on disk, as well as the path users
will interact with to use our module.

Creating a library crate to support a Rust binary crate in the same package

After getting the user's input, we need to
figure out a filename to write the file out
as. We can either use the title the user
passed in, or we can try to use heuristics
to find a title from the markdown content.

We can combine the user's title from the cli
arguments (an `Option`) with the logic we
use as a heuristic for the markdown (also
an `Option`).

```rust
// use `title` if the user passed it in,
// otherwise try to find a heading in the markdown
let document_title = title.or_else(|| {
    contents
        .lines()
        .find(|v| v.starts_with("# "))
        // markdown headings are required to have `# ` with
        // at least one space
        .map(|maybe_line| maybe_line.trim_start_matches("# ").to_string())
});
```

`option.or_else()` returns the original
option if it is a `Some` value, or executes
the function to return a different `Option`
if not. So `document_title` is an
`Option<String>` either way and we've
covered all of the possible scenarios:

1. the user has passed in a title
2. the user has written content with a heading
3. the user has done neither of these

Which leaves us to our markdown heuristic.

Markdown headings are required to have `# `
with at least one space, so we can turn
`contents` into an iterator and `find` the
first line that starts with `# `.

If we find one, we want to trim `# ` off of
the heading to get just the heading content,
so we can use `map` to operate on the value
inside of the `Option` returned by `find` if
it exists.

```rust
contents
    .lines()
    .find(|v| v.starts_with("# "))
    .map(|maybe_line| maybe_line.trim_start_matches("# ").to_string())
```

Now this code works fine, but it exposes a bug
in our file handling.

If we `write_all` to the `file`, that moves the
internal cursor to the end of that content. So
when we run our code now, `contents` is
skipping the first `# ` bytes, which means our
heuristic will only find the second heading in
the file.

To fix this, we can bring in the `std::io::Seek`
trait, and seek to the beginning of the file.

```rust
let mut contents = String::new();
file.seek(SeekFrom::Start(0))?;
file.read_to_string(&mut contents)?;
```

Using the Option type in Rust to pick from multiple values that might not exist

We can match on `opt.cmd` to determine which `Command`
variants was called. This lets us specify the variants
as match criteria and also destructure the values out
to use them.

```rust
    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
    }
```

As written, we run into two issues with this code.
One is that we aren't using `title` yet. In
destructuring, we can use the placeholder (`_`) in our
[pattern](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html).

```
warning: unused variable: `title`
  --> src/main.rs:32:26
   |
32 |         Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
   |                          ^^^^^ help: try ignoring the field: `title: _`
   |
   = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default
```

```rust
fn main() -> Result<()> {
    color_eyre::install()?;

    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title: _ } => todo!(),
    }
}
```

The second issue is that the `opt` variable is moved
before we try to destructure it. If we look at the
compiler output before we fixed the `title` issue we
see the value use after move pointing at `title`
specifically.

```
error[E0382]: use of moved value
m  --> src/main.rs:32:26
   |
29 |     let opt = Opt::from_args();
   |         --- move occurs because `opt` has type `Opt`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
30 |     dbg!(opt);
   |     ---------- value moved here
31 |     match opt.cmd {
32 |         Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
   |                          ^^^^^ value used here after move
```

If we look at it after fixing the unused `title`,
we see the compiler point at `opt.cmd`.

```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `opt.cmd`
  --> src/main.rs:31:11
   |
29 |     let opt = Opt::from_args();
   |         --- move occurs because `opt` has type `Opt`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
30 |     dbg!(opt);
   |     ---------- value moved here
31 |     match opt.cmd {
   |           ^^^^^^^ value used here after move
```

This is because opt is moved into the `dbg` call because
it doesn't implement the `Copy` trait. Now, we could
implement or derive `Copy` for `Opt` if `Command` can
implement `Copy`, but we can not implement `Copy` for
`Command`. This is because `String` does not, and can not,
implement `Copy`, and we have a `String` in our `title`.

Without diving into the depths of `Copy`, [`Clone`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/clone/trait.Clone.html),
and allocation, there is something we have that already
implements `Copy`, so we don't need to.

Shared references implement `Copy`.

So instead of passing `opt` into `dbg!`, and thus using
move semantics (which are the default in Rust), we can
pass a shared reference in: `dgb!(&opt)` which lets us
use copy semantics.

The difference between move semantics and copy semantics
in this case is that we can access `opt` after passing it
to `dbg!`.

Under the hood, both a copy and a move can result in bits
being copied in memory, although this is sometimes
optimized away. -- [Copy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html)

```rust
fn main() -> Result<()> {
    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title: _ } => todo!(),
    }
}
```

Matching structopt commands and using Rust values after move

Cargo allows us to execute a few different kinds of tests,
including integration and unit. For now we'll talk about
integration tests for our CLI. Integration tests
live in `/tests` and only have access to the public
interface of a crate.

In this case, we'll run the `garden` binary using
`assert_cmd` and assert various things about the
execution and output. For example, that the binary
exits successfully and that stderr has no output.

`cargo test` allows us to run all tests.

To restrict the number of tests that run to only the two
that work, we can use `cargo test help` to restrict
cargo to only running tests that match the keyword "help",
or use `#[ignore]` on a test we want to ignore.

The third test will be ignored because we have yet to
build out our functionality.

Integration testing Cargo binaries with assert_cmd

The StructOpt crate allows us to derive our human person functionality from our Struct definitions. 

We will create a `structop` for our `write` subcommand that will take a short and long flag for our `title` argument

---

```
cargo add structopt
```

structopt allows us to derive argument parsing functionality from our
structs. The name is a play on `struct Opt {}`. To do this we need to
`derive(StructOpt)` on our struct. In this case we have a subcommand,
so we'll set up one of the fields on the `Opt` struct to be a
`structopt(subcommand)`. This subcommand value will be an enum,
indicating that only one subcommand can be used at a time.

structopt also gives us tools to specify one of three argument types:

* positional
* short
* long

By default every argument is a positional argument, which means that in
this case if we left it as-is, the CLI would function as

```
garden write my-title
```

We want to use a flag, so we'll use structopt to generate short and long
flags for the title argument with `structopt(short, long)`. That gives
the use the option of `-t` and `--title` to specify a title.

structopt also contains some type processing, so all we need to do is
specify that title is an optional string and the flags will become
optional. That is: a user can specify or not specify a title.

```rust
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
enum Command {
    Write {
        #[structopt(short, long)]
        title: Option<String>,
    },
}
```

After setting up `struct Opt`, we can parse the args and use
the dbg!() macro to print them to the console so we can see
what they look like.

```rust
let opt = Opt::from_args();
dbg!(opt);
```

To do that we also need to `derive(Debug)` in addition to
structopt on both the enum and the struct.

Given input like

```
garden write
```

We will see the following output.

```rust
[src/main.rs:21] opt = Opt {
    cmd: Write {
        title: None,
    },
}
```

We can choose to `cargo build` and then `./target/debug/garden write`
or we can use `cargo run -- write`. The `--` ensures that our arguments
get passed to the CLI we're building and not `cargo run`. This is
especially relevant when passing something like `--help`.

Setting up git-like subcommands using structopt

if we run `cargo run -- --help`, we can see that structopt
thinks the name of our binary is still the package name.
We can change that with another attribute macro on our
struct.

```
digital-garden 0.1.0

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write
```

Also notice that in the help text the `help` subcommand
has some helpful output while `write` has none:

```
garden 0.1.0

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write
```

There are a number of places we can put doc comments.
We can write on the `Opt` struct for global information
about the CLI.

We can also write on each subcommand or even the options
for each subcommand.

```
/// A CLI for the growing and curation of a digital garden
///
/// Visit https://www.rustadventure.rs/garden for more!
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
enum Command {
    /// write something in your garden
    ///
    /// This command will open your $EDITOR, wait for you
    /// to write something, and then save the file to your
    /// garden
    Write {
        /// Optionally set a title for what you are going to write about
        #[structopt(short, long)]
        title: Option<String>,
    },
}
```

Each of these results in documentation going to the relevant
place in the CLI help text. Note especially that the first
line of doc comment for subcommands is shown as "short"
help text, while the full text is reserved for running
`--help` directly on the subcommand.

```
❯ cargo run
garden 0.1.0
A CLI for the growing and curation of a digital garden

Visit https://www.rustadventure.rs/garden for more!

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write    write something in your garden
```

```
❯ cargo run -- write --help
garden-write 0.1.0
write something in your garden

This command will open your $EDITOR, wait for you to write something, and then save the file to your garden

USAGE:
    garden write [OPTIONS]

FLAGS:
    -h, --help
            Prints help information

    -V, --version
            Prints version information

OPTIONS:
    -t, --title <title>
            Optionally set a title for what you are going to write about
```

Also note that `-h` and `--help` are *not* the same thing when it comes to structopt.

Documenting and writing helptext for Structopt CLI commands and flags

This lesson demonstrates how to utilize DeepSeek's R1 model to access its reasoning capabilities and then seamlessly transition to other models for subsequent tasks. By extracting the reasoning output from DeepSeek R1, you can leverage its powerful reasoning while gaining the speed, cost efficiency, and configuration flexibility of alternative models. This two-phase approach begins with DeepSeek’s new R1 model, praised for its open-source nature and value. You then gain the adaptability to switch to other models depending on your needs or existing workflows. This lesson provides a step-by-step walkthrough of this process, along with demo code to help you implement this technique yourself.

Combine DeepSeek R1 Reasoning with GPT 3.5 Turbo for the Cheapest, Fastest, and Best AI

While much focus in AI has been on optimizing input and generating concise outputs, a new model in Google's AI Studio dramatically expands output possibilities with a capacity of 65,000 tokens. This represents a significant shift, opening doors to new application scenarios, especially for developers and creators. This lesson explores a practical and immediately useful scenario: leveraging this large output capability within Google's AI Studio to generate extensive sample datasets for your projects. Whether you are developing a new application, building a resource, or require robust datasets for testing and validation, this model offers a powerful solution. We'll demonstrate how to move beyond the constraints of short responses and utilize the full potential of large output models to generate the data volume and variety you need, enhancing your development workflow through Google's AI Studio.

AI Studio's New 65k Output Opens Exciting Possibilities

This lesson explores how to use Cursor to generate and maintain English specifications as a form of living documentation. Learn how these automatically created documents can serve as a consistent and up-to-date representation of your code's behavior. The video highlights how reviewing and refining these English specifications can help ensure that code modifications align with the intended purpose and that documentation accurately reflects the current codebase, promoting better long-term code maintainability and clarity.

Here's the "english-spec.md" used in the video:

```markdown
> You are an AI specialized in analyzing source code and producing structured, plain-English representations of its functionality.  
>  
> **Your Task**:  
> 1. Read and interpret the code I provide.  
> 2. Produce a technical, English-only summary of what the code does.  
> 3. Use headings and bullet points to clearly outline the roles of each function, class, variable, or important logic block.  
> 4. **Do not include any actual code** in your final output. Instead, translate the code’s content into an English explanation (like a specification or documentation).  
> 5. Keep the explanation concise but thorough. Focus on explaining the purpose, process, and relationships between functions or modules in the code.  

**User Prompt to the AI**:

> **Instruction**: Convert the following code into a single file of pure English text that outlines exactly what each part of the code does. Use bullet points, headings, and descriptive language. Do not show any code—only explain how the code behaves. This is intended to serve as a human-readable spec or “translation” of the code.  
>  
> **Code**:  
> ~~~  
> [PASTE YOUR CODE HERE]  
> ~~~  

**Example Input/Output #1**:

- **Example Code (Input):**
  ~~~js
  // example1.js
  const greetUser = (userName) => {
    const greeting = `Hello, ${userName}!`;
    console.log(greeting);
  };

  greetUser("Alice");
  ~~~

- **Example Explanation (Output)**:
  ~~~
  # Overview
  - This file defines a single function which greets a user by name and prints a message to the console.
  
  # Function: greetUser
  - Accepts one parameter (`userName`).
  - Constructs a greeting string that combines static text with the `userName`.
  - Outputs the greeting using `console.log`.

  # Behavior Flow
  - The function is called with the argument "Alice".
  - Upon invocation, "Hello, Alice!" is logged to the console.

  # Key Points
  - Shows how to create a greeting with a dynamic name.
  - Demonstrates basic string interpolation and console logging.
  ~~~

**Example Input/Output #2**:

- **Example Code (Input):**
  ~~~py
  # example2.py
  class Calculator:
      def __init__(self, initial=0):
          self.value = initial
      
      def add(self, amount):
          self.value += amount
      
      def subtract(self, amount):
          self.value -= amount
      
      def get_value(self):
          return self.value

  calc = Calculator(10)
  calc.add(5)
  calc.subtract(3)
  result = calc.get_value()
  print(result)
  ~~~

- **Example Explanation (Output):**
  ~~~
  # Overview
  - This file defines a `Calculator` class that keeps track of an internal numerical value and provides methods to modify it.
  
  # Class: Calculator
  - **Constructor** (`__init__`):
    - Accepts an optional initial value (default is 0).
    - Stores the initial value in a `value` property.
  - **Method: add**:
    - Takes an `amount` and increments the internal `value` by that amount.
  - **Method: subtract**:
    - Takes an `amount` and decrements the internal `value` by that amount.
  - **Method: get_value**:
    - Returns the current internal `value`.
  
  # Behavior Flow
  - An instance of `Calculator` is created with an initial value of 10.
  - The `add` method is called with 5, raising the value to 15.
  - The `subtract` method is called with 3, lowering the value to 12.
  - The `get_value` method is called to retrieve the current value (12).
  - The result (12) is printed to the console.

  # Key Points
  - Demonstrates basic OOP with a class that manages state.
  - Showcases constructor, addition, subtraction, and retrieval of a stored value.
  ~~~  

---

## Final Prompt

Below is a full, combined version of the prompt you can provide to an AI to guide it in generating the English-only, bullet-pointed explanation. Feel free to modify or adapt this as needed:

~~~
You are an AI specialized in analyzing source code and producing structured, plain-English representations of its functionality.

Your Task:
1. Read and interpret the code I provide.
2. Produce a technical, English-only summary of what the code does.
3. Use headings (e.g. # Overview, # Functions, # Classes, # Behavior Flow) and bullet points.
4. Do not include any code in your final output—only explain how the code behaves.
5. Keep it concise but thorough, focusing on purpose, process, and relationships between functions or modules.

Below are some examples of how code might be transformed into an English-only explanation:

Example Input:
-------------------
~~~js
// example1.js
const greetUser = (userName) => {
  const greeting = `Hello, ${userName}!`;
  console.log(greeting);
};

greetUser("Alice");
~~~
Example Output:
-------------------
# Overview
- This file defines a single function which greets a user by name and prints a message to the console.

# Function: greetUser
- Accepts one parameter (`userName`).
- Constructs a greeting string that combines static text with the `userName`.
- Outputs the greeting using `console.log`.

# Behavior Flow
- The function is called with the argument "Alice".
- Upon invocation, "Hello, Alice!" is logged to the console.

# Key Points
- Shows how to create a greeting with a dynamic name.
- Demonstrates basic string interpolation and console logging.


Example Input:
-------------------
~~~py
# example2.py
class Calculator:
    def __init__(self, initial=0):
        self.value = initial
    
    def add(self, amount):
        self.value += amount
    
    def subtract(self, amount):
        self.value -= amount
    
    def get_value(self):
        return self.value

calc = Calculator(10)
calc.add(5)
calc.subtract(3)
result = calc.get_value()
print(result)
~~~
Example Output:
-------------------
# Overview
- This file defines a `Calculator` class that keeps track of an internal numerical value and provides methods to modify it.

# Class: Calculator
- **Constructor** (`__init__`):
  - Accepts an optional initial value (default is 0).
  - Stores the initial value in a `value` property.
- **Method: add**:
  - Takes an `amount` and increments the internal `value` by that amount.
- **Method: subtract**:
  - Takes an `amount` and decrements the internal `value` by that amount.
- **Method: get_value**:
  - Returns the current internal `value`.

# Behavior Flow
- An instance of `Calculator` is created with an initial value of 10.
- The `add` method is called with 5, raising the value to 15.
- The `subtract` method is called with 3, lowering the value to 12.
- The `get_value` method is called to retrieve the current value (12).
- The result (12) is printed to the console.

# Key Points
- Demonstrates basic OOP with a class that manages state.
- Showcases constructor, addition, subtraction, and retrieval of a stored value.

---

**Now**: Please apply the same conversion process to the following code. Convert it into a plain-English document that describes what the code does in detail, using bullet points and headings. Create the document next to the original with the filename as `${fileName}.md`. Do not include any source code in the output—only the explanation:

[INSERT YOUR CODE HERE]
```

Programming in English with Cursor

In this lesson, you'll learn how to enhance the accuracy of components generated by Cursor Composer by aligning your project's package.json with Cursor's rules. We'll guide you through extracting the list of installed packages from your package.json and incorporating them into your .cursorrules file, along with brief descriptions of their functionalities. By providing Cursor with this contextual information, you'll enable it to generate components that are more precise and functional on the first attempt. The lesson includes demonstrations of component generation both with and without these enhancements, highlighting the improvements in accuracy and efficiency.

Boost Cursor Composer Accuracy: Integrating package.json with Cursor Rules

Speed up your bug-fixing process dramatically with Cursors Composer. Take a warning from your logs, search for relevant terms, then seamlessly import both the warning and search results into Composer. Add documentation and apply fixes to all search results in one go. This streamlined workflow resolves multiple issues rapidly, saving valuable development time.

Batch Fix Every File in Search Results with Cursor's Composer

 We map over the initial set of results then use `Promise.all` to efficiently fetch the details of each pokemon rendered in the table. This allows us to add more columns to our pokemon table.

Fetch and display row details with Promise.all in Tanstack Table

map over the initial set of results then use `Promise.all` to efficiently fetch the details of each pokemon rendered in the tanstack table

Create a custom hook to fetch remote data by passing a promise to the React 19 `use` hook. Then render this data in Tanstack Table by memoizing the results and passing them to `useReactTable`.

Render remote data in a Tanstack Table with React 19's use hook and a promise

Create a custom hook using React 19’s use to fetch data with a promise. Render it in a Tanstack Table by memoizing and using useReactTable.

You know when you're deep in the code trenches and need someone to challenge your assumptions? That's exactly what this is about.

Instead of waiting for someone to poke holes in your master plan, you can paste that strategy straight into AI Studio and let it pressure test your ideas. We're talking about using this tool to validate everything from your feature proposals to your ambitious refactoring strategies.

The real magic happens when you hit that microphone button. Now you're in a real-time verbal sparring match. It's like rubber duck debugging but the duck actually pushes back and makes you defend every architectural decision you've made.

Here's the workflow:
1. Drop your master plan into the system instructions
2. Tell the AI to challenge every assumption
3. Hit that mic and defend your choices like you mean it
4. Watch your plan either emerge stronger or get rightfully dismantled

This approach is perfect when you're:
- Stuck in your own head with a complex problem
- Need to validate if your approach holds water
- Want to catch edge cases before they catch you
- Looking for opportunities you might have missed because you're too close to the code

It's like having a senior dev on call 24/7, ready to challenge your ideas and push you to think deeper about your solutions.

Now go forth and get your ideas challenged. Your projects will thank you for it.


An Uncomfortable and Challenging Conversation with AI Studio

In this lesson, you'll learn how to effectively brainstorm your project ideas before working with AI agents. We'll cover:

1. The importance of having a clear plan before starting work with AI agents
2. Using traditional brainstorming techniques to gather your thoughts
3. Leveraging video recording to capture your brainstorming session
4. How to review and analyze websites for inspiration
5. Documenting likes, dislikes, and potential features for your project
6. Using AI tools (like AI Studio) to organize and process your recorded brainstorming session

The lesson emphasizes a modern approach to brainstorming that combines traditional techniques with video recording, making it easier to later process your ideas through AI tools. This method helps ensure that no ideas are lost and that your thoughts can be effectively organized by AI for future reference.

How to Brainstorm Your Project Features to Prepare for AI Agents

fast-check allows us to create composite generators that suit our testing needs. We'll generate two numbers to create a point simulating an X and Y and assert that the distance should always be greater than or equal to 0.