Rust is a systems programming language that runs blazingly fast, prevents segfaults, and guarantees thread safety.

rust

Learn Rust

In this course, Chris takes a README-driven approach to build out a Rust CLI that supports content authoring for a digital garden.

Specifically, you'll work through the first command for the CLI, writing files. You start by initializing a new Cargo binary crate through creating the `write` command that allows you to create files (and their contents) to the folder that you set. 

Step by step you'll learn about:
- Handling user input
- Error handling
- Rust Move semantics
- Rust Copy semantics
- Integration testing

...and more!

Creating a Digital Garden CLI with Rust

While we have `test_write_with_title`
which tests the garden CLI with a given
title flag, we can also set up additional
tests, such as for using a written title
in the document for the filename.

Copy/pasting the code from test one into
test two is a lot of duplication, and
setting up the fake editor isn't going
to change across tests, so let's abstract
the creation of the temporary directory,
the fake editor script path, and the
`Command` itself into a utility function.

The port is relatively straightforward,
with the only changes being that we cut
off the `cmd` modifications before the
`.arg` calls, and now have to return
the `cmd` and the `temp_dir` in a tuple.

We return the actual `Command` and `TempDir`,
yielding ownership to the calling function
because we have no further use for them here,
but the calling function will need to mutate
the `Command` more, and use `TempDir` to test.

```rust
fn setup_command() -> (Command, assert_fs::TempDir) {
    let temp_dir = assert_fs::TempDir::new().unwrap();

    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    cmd.env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .env("GARDEN_PATH", temp_dir.path());
    (cmd, temp_dir)
}
```

The new write tests are considerably shorter
now and focus mostly on which subcommand to
call, and what the user interaction with that
subcommand is.

```rust

fn test_write_with_title() {
    let (mut cmd, temp_dir) = setup_command();
    let assert = cmd
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("atitle.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}

fn test_write_with_written_title() {
    let (mut cmd, temp_dir) = setup_command();
    let assert = cmd
        .arg("write")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("testing.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}
```

Abstracting test utilities inside integration test files

We can print lines to the terminal and
ask the user for various input. So let's
make the interface a bit more usable by
using colored output.

We can do this by bringing an extension
trait for formatting into scope:
`OwoColorize`.

Extension traits are one-off traits that
are used to add functions to a type that
our crate doesn't own. A crate can create
the new trait, then implement the
functions defined by that trait on a type
the crate doesn't own and if we bring that
trait into scope, the type will get the
extra functions. In this case, `OwoColorize`
is used for adding color functions to
formatters like Display and Debug.

We'll start with `ask_for_filename`

```rust
use color_eyre::owo_colors::OwoColorize;

fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
        "{}",
        "\
Enter filename
> "
        .blue()
        .bold(),
    ))
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
    .map(|title| slug::slugify(title))
}
```

In `confirm_filename` we can use multiple
formatters to get different colors:

```rust
let result = rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
    "\
{} {}
Do you want a different title? (y/N): ",
    "current title:".green().bold(),
    raw_title,
))
.wrap_err("Failed to get input for y/n question")?;
```

Using owo_colors Extension Traits to colorize terminal output

`PathBuf` lets us check to see if a file
exists before writing to it, so we can
take advantage of that to make sure that
we don't overwrite a file that already
exists, even if the user has indicated
a title that would overwrite another file.

```
let mut i: usize = 0;
loop {
    let dest_filename = format!(
        "{}{}",
        filename,
        if i == 0 {
            "".to_string()
        } else {
            i.to_string()
        }
    );
    let mut dest = garden_path.join(dest_filename);
    dest.set_extension("md");
    if dest.exists() {
        i = i + 1;
    } else {
        fs::rename(garden_tmpfile, &dest)?;
        break;
    }
}
```

Checking for file existence with PathBuf to ensure unique filenames

We have been ignoring implementing tests for the write subcommand. Now is the time that we'll test the command we have been building.

We'll build out a fake editor script that our test will use to check if the command is functioning properly. We will then use `arg` to build the command as we would normally use it ourselves.

After writing the test, we'll see how to clean up after ourselves so that we aren't leaving testing artifacts leftover just from running a test.

---

How to integration test a cargo binary that calls
out to `EDITOR` for modifications and asks the
user for input.

First we'll create a fake editor script to use
instead of vim, etc.

`tests/fake_editor.sh` is a one-liner.

```shell
echo "testing" >> $1;
```

Then we'll write our test using `assert_cmd` to
build up a `Command` that points to the `garden`
binary in out `Cargo.toml`.

We grab the fake editor path script using
`std::env::current_dir()`, make sure the file
exists (which means we've grabbed the right
path), and spawn a new `Command` with the
`EDITOR` variable set to the fake editor
script. The equivalent call to our bin is

```shell
EDITOR=path/to/fake-editor.sh garden write -t atitle
```

And the rust code to execute.

```rust
fn test_write_with_title() {
    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    let assert = cmd
        .env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();
}
```

Note that we're asserting that the command
exited sucessfully, and that we're inputing
`N\n` to the bin's stdin, which responds to
a request for user input after the editor
closes.

Note that this doesn't actually test for
the resulting file existence, and also that
we're writing our files out directly into
our default digital garden! We can solve
this with `assert_fs` and `predicates`.

We'll bring in both preludes (a prelude is
a bunch of stuff the library author thinks
will be useful to have around all the time)
and create a new temporary directory.

We'll use the `GARDEN_PATH` environment
variable to pass the temporary directory in
to the `garden` bin and that's it, we've
added a temporary directory to our test.
No more polluting the default garden!

```rust
use assert_fs::prelude::*;
use predicates::prelude::*;

fn test_write_with_title() {
    let temp_dir = assert_fs::TempDir::new().unwrap();

    let mut cmd = Command::cargo_bin("garden").unwrap();
    let fake_editor_path = std::env::current_dir()
        .expect("expect to be in a dir")
        .join("tests")
        .join("fake-editor.sh");
    if !fake_editor_path.exists() {
        panic!(
            "fake editor shell script could not be found"
        )
    }

    let assert = cmd
        .env("EDITOR", fake_editor_path.into_os_string())
        .env("GARDEN_PATH", temp_dir.path())
        .arg("write")
        .arg("-t")
        .arg("atitle")
        .write_stdin("N\n".as_bytes())
        .assert();

    assert.success();

    temp_dir
        .child("atitle.md")
        .assert(predicate::path::exists());
}
```

Now that's enough, but we can also check
to make sure the file we expect to exist
actually exists. `temp_dir.child` gives
us the possible file, and we can assert
on that file with a test from `predicates`
that tests to make sure the file exists.

```rust
temp_dir
    .child("atitle.md")
    .assert(predicate::path::exists());
```

Using assert_fs and predicates to integration test with a real temporary file system

What user experience do we want for the
act of writing?

We have a few options, including letting
users write directly in the console or giving
them a prepared file that they can then open
and write in.

Writing directly in the console doesn't give
a user access to their text editor of choice.
Which means lacking autocomplete, syntax
highlighting, snippets, and other functionality.

Creating a file and handling the path back to
the user doesn't quite work for us either, as
that reduces the utility of the garden write
command to the equivalent of running `touch
filename.md`.

So for our use case, we'd ideally like to open
the user's preferred editing environment,
whatever that happens to be, then wait for them
to be done with the file before continuing.

Since we're working with a CLI tool, we
can safely assume that our users either
know how to, or are willingly to learn how
to, set environment variables. This means we
can use the `EDITOR` variable to select an
editor to use. This is the same way `git commit`
works.

---

In Rust, there is a crate that handles not only
`EDITOR`, but also various fallbacks per-platform.
We'll take advantage of [edit](https://crates.io/crates/edit)
to call out to the user's choice of editor.

The quick usage of edit allows us to call the
`edit::edit` function, and get the user's data.

```rust
pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    dbg!(garden_path, title);
    let template = "# ";
    let content_from_user = edit::edit(template).wrap_err("unable to read writing")?;
    dbg!(content_from_user);
    todo!()
}
```

This results in a filename that looks like:
`.tmpBy0Yun` "somewhere else" on the filesystem,
in a location the user would never reasonably
find it. Ideally, if anything went wrong, the
user would be able to take a look at the
in-progress tempfile they were just working on,
which should be in an easily discoverable place
like the garden path.

*We don't want to lose a user's work.*

Additionally, the tempfile doesn't have a file
extension, which means that the user's editor
will be less likely to recognize it as a
markdown file, so we want to add `.md` to the
filepath.

```rust
use color_eyre::{eyre::WrapErr, Result};
use edit::{edit_file, Builder};
use std::io::{Read, Write};
use std::path::PathBuf;

const TEMPLATE: &[u8; 2] = b"# ";

pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    let (mut file, filepath) = Builder::new()
        .suffix(".md")
        .rand_bytes(5)
        .tempfile_in(&garden_path)
        .wrap_err("Failed to create wip file")?
        .keep()
        .wrap_err("Failed to keep tempfile")?;
    file.write_all(TEMPLATE)?;
    // let the user write whatever they want in their favorite editor
    // before returning to the cli and finishing up
    edit_file(filepath)?;
    // Read the user's changes back from the file into a string
    let mut contents = String::new();
    file.read_to_string(&mut contents)?;

    dbg!(contents);
    todo!()
}
```

We will use the `edit::Builder` API to generate
a random tempfile to let the user write content
into. The suffix is going to be `.md` and the
filename will be 5 random bytes. We also put
the tempfile in the garden path, which ensures
a user will be able to find it if necessary.

`wrap_err` (which requires the `eyre::WrapErr`
trait in scope) wraps the potential error
resulting from these calls with additional context,
making the original error the source, and we can
keep chaining after that. We `keep` the tempfile,
which would otherwise be deleted when all handles
closed, because if anything goes wrong after the
user inputs data, we want to make sure we don't
lose that data.

After the file is created, we write our template
out to the file before passing control to the
user. This requires the `std::io::Write` trait
in scope. We use a const for the file template
because it won't change. To make the `TEMPLATE`
a const, we also need to give it a type, which
is a two element byte array. Change the string
to see how the byte array length is checked at
compile time.

Since we have access to the `file` already, we
can read the contents back into a string after
the user is done editing. This requires having
the `std::io::Read` trait in scope.

And now we've let the user write into a file
which will stick around as long as we need it
to, and importantly will stick around if any
errors happen in the execution of the program,
so we lose no user data and can remove the
temporary file at the end of the program
ourselves if all goes well.

Passing control to the user's favorite editor (such as VSCode) from the CLI

Given the potential `document_title` we now
want to ask the user if the title is still
what they want to use so that we can write
the file to disk. This will involve two
paths depending on if we have an existing
potential option or not.

We will need to use `ask_for_filename` in
`confirm_filename`, so we'll write that branch
first.

```rust
let filename = match document_title {
    Some(raw_title) => {
        // confirm_filename()?
        todo!()
    }
    None => ask_for_filename(),
};
```

`rprompt` allows us to ask for a small amount
of input from the user (compared to the  much
larger input possible by passing control to
the user's editor).

We'll use `rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr` to
get a response from the user, and `.wrap_err`
to add context to the error if anything goes
wrong.

```rust
fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(
        "\
Enter filename
> ",
    )
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
}
```

We'll use the same behavior for the first
part of `confirm_filename`. We'll also
need to use our first lifetime to account
for the shared reference argument.

`match` can match against multiple values
for the same branch, so we'll take advantage
of that to handle branches for Ns and Ys, as
well as the default case. If anything goes
wrong, such as someone inputting an "a",
we'll fall through using `loop` and ask again
until we get a usable answer

```rust
fn confirm_filename(raw_title: &str) -> Result<String> {
    loop {
        // prompt defaults to uppercase character in question
        // this is a convention, not a requirement enforced by
        // the code
        let result = rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(&format!(
            "\
current title: `{}`
Do you want a different title? (y/N): ",
            raw_title,
        ))
        .wrap_err("Failed to get input for y/n question")?;

        match result.as_str() {
            "y" | "Y" => break ask_for_filename(),
            "n" | "N" | "" => {
                // the capital N in the prompt means "default",
                // so we handle "" as input here
                break Ok(slug::slugify(raw_title));
            }
            _ => {
                // ask again because something went wrong
            }
        };
    }
}
```

While filenames can technically have spaces
in them, we're going to slugify our filenames
like urls for a few reasons. One is that
when starting out, many programmers fail to
quote filename arguments in their bash scripts,
which results in filenames with spaces being
treated as separate arguments. Another is
that this is a digital garden CLI, and
digital gardens are often stored in git,
accessed from multiple file systems, as well
as from URLs. While strictly speaking we don't
need to slugify our filenames, we will here
so as to adhere to a safer set of characters.

```
cargo add slug
```

We'll map over the `Result` from `rprompt`
which allows us to operate on the internal
value if it's `Ok`.

```rust
fn ask_for_filename() -> Result<String> {
    rprompt::prompt_reply_stderr(
        "\
Enter filename
> ",
    )
    .wrap_err("Failed to get filename")
    .map(|title| slug::slugify(title))
}
```

We'll also use slugify in `confirm_filename`

```rust
match result.as_str() {
    "y" | "Y" => break ask_for_filename(),
    "n" | "N" | "" => {
        // the capital N in the prompt means "default",
        // so we handle "" as input here
        break Ok(slug::slugify(raw_title));
    }
    _ => {
        // ask again because something went wrong
    }
};
```

The fact that `confirm_filename` and
`ask_for_filename` have the same return type
is important because the branches of a `match`
need to return the same type.

Prompting the user for input with rprompt and loop

We want to build out functionality to let the user
write into a file in their garden. To do that, we
have to know the location of their garden.

We'll start by implementing a function to get the
default garden path.

```rust
fn get_default_garden_dir() -> Result<PathBuf> {
    let user_dirs = UserDirs::new().ok_or_else(|| eyre!("Could not find home directory"))?;
    Ok(user_dirs.home_dir().join(".garden"))
}
```

This uses the user's system directories via the
`directories` crate to find their home dir. We
then add `.garden` to the home dir for the default
garden.

Ideally, we would want the user to be able to
specify their garden path. Using structopt, we
can let them specify it as a short, long, or
env var.

In our README, we'll specify how this should work.

````

```shell
GARDEN_PATH=~/github/my-digital-garden garden write
garden -p ~/github/my-digital-garden write
garden --garden_path ~/github/my-digital-garden write
```
````

And in our `Opt` struct, we can tell structopt how to
handle it. Putting this in our `Opt` struct instead of
our `Command` enum make it a global flag that can be
specified for all subcommands.

```rust
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(parse(from_os_str), short = "p", long, env)]
    garden_path: Option<PathBuf>,

    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
```

structopt is only handling the user input, so in
`main()` we still need to fall back to the
default if the `garden_path` is not specified.

```rust
let garden_path = match opt.garden_path {
    Some(pathbuf) => Ok(pathbuf),
    None => get_default_garden_dir().wrap_err("`garden_path` was not supplied"),
}?;
```

if we force an `Err` in `get_default_garden_dir`
We can see how the wrapped errors end up stacking.

```
Error:
   0: `garden_path` was not supplied
   1: Could not find home directory
```

We'll also change the signature of `write` to
accept the pathbuf.

```
Command::Write { title } => write(garden_path, title),
```

Note that we need to import `PathBuf`. We can also
`dbg!` the garden path and title to see their
values.

```rust
use std::path::PathBuf;

pub fn write(garden_path: PathBuf, title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    dbg!(garden_path, title);
    todo!()
}
```

Adding support for global flags that apply for all subcommands with structopt

In our subcommand match we'll add a new function called
`write` to handle our `Write` subcommand. We'll pass it
the argument title and we'll "import" it from a library
called `digital_garden`. 

```rust
use digital_garden::write;

fn main() -> Result<()> {
    color_eyre::install()?;

    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title } => write(title),
    }
}
```

To create this library, add a new section in `Cargo.toml`.
We can give our library a name and set which file to treat
as the entrypoint. `src/lib.rs` is the default file for
a library crate, but we can also be explicit about what we
want to happen.

```toml
[lib]
name = "digital_garden"
path = "src/lib.rs"
```

This leaves us with two crates, a binary crate, of which we
can have any amount, and a library crate, of which we can
only have 0 or 1.

We'll create the `src/lib.rs` file with the following
contents.

```rust
mod write;

pub use write::write;
```

Rust's module system is explicit, so when we write
`mod write`, we are saying that the library `digital_garden`
has a module `write`, such that the path to the module is
`digital_garden::write`.

In our case `digital_garden::write` corresponds to a file
at `src/write.rs`.

Secondly, the `pub use write::write` says that we have a
function called `write` in the module called `write` and
that the function will be exposed from lib publicly, so
people who have the `digital_garden` library installed
will be able to use the write function as
`digital_garden::write`.

In JavaScript the closest analogue is exporting a function
from another file that exports it.

```js
export { write } from './write.js';
```

By using use, we're shortening the public path to the write
function. A private module "write" with a function "write"
also exists at `digital_garden::write::write`. If you try
to use this path, Rust will tell you there is a private
module there.

Finally, in `src/write.rs`, we can write a public function
that matches the return type of our main function, since
we're using it as the return value from our match function.

We'll accept an `Option<String>` as an argument as well,
since that's what we expect from the cli arguments.

```rust
use color_eyre::Result;

pub fn write(_title: Option<String>) -> Result<()> {
    todo!()
}
```

The purpose of creating this module path is because we
know that we're going to set up more modules for each
subcommand in the future, and we can control both the
placement of our code on disk, as well as the path users
will interact with to use our module.

Creating a library crate to support a Rust binary crate in the same package

After getting the user's input, we need to
figure out a filename to write the file out
as. We can either use the title the user
passed in, or we can try to use heuristics
to find a title from the markdown content.

We can combine the user's title from the cli
arguments (an `Option`) with the logic we
use as a heuristic for the markdown (also
an `Option`).

```rust
// use `title` if the user passed it in,
// otherwise try to find a heading in the markdown
let document_title = title.or_else(|| {
    contents
        .lines()
        .find(|v| v.starts_with("# "))
        // markdown headings are required to have `# ` with
        // at least one space
        .map(|maybe_line| maybe_line.trim_start_matches("# ").to_string())
});
```

`option.or_else()` returns the original
option if it is a `Some` value, or executes
the function to return a different `Option`
if not. So `document_title` is an
`Option<String>` either way and we've
covered all of the possible scenarios:

1. the user has passed in a title
2. the user has written content with a heading
3. the user has done neither of these

Which leaves us to our markdown heuristic.

Markdown headings are required to have `# `
with at least one space, so we can turn
`contents` into an iterator and `find` the
first line that starts with `# `.

If we find one, we want to trim `# ` off of
the heading to get just the heading content,
so we can use `map` to operate on the value
inside of the `Option` returned by `find` if
it exists.

```rust
contents
    .lines()
    .find(|v| v.starts_with("# "))
    .map(|maybe_line| maybe_line.trim_start_matches("# ").to_string())
```

Now this code works fine, but it exposes a bug
in our file handling.

If we `write_all` to the `file`, that moves the
internal cursor to the end of that content. So
when we run our code now, `contents` is
skipping the first `# ` bytes, which means our
heuristic will only find the second heading in
the file.

To fix this, we can bring in the `std::io::Seek`
trait, and seek to the beginning of the file.

```rust
let mut contents = String::new();
file.seek(SeekFrom::Start(0))?;
file.read_to_string(&mut contents)?;
```

Using the Option type in Rust to pick from multiple values that might not exist

We can match on `opt.cmd` to determine which `Command`
variants was called. This lets us specify the variants
as match criteria and also destructure the values out
to use them.

```rust
    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
    }
```

As written, we run into two issues with this code.
One is that we aren't using `title` yet. In
destructuring, we can use the placeholder (`_`) in our
[pattern](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html).

```
warning: unused variable: `title`
  --> src/main.rs:32:26
   |
32 |         Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
   |                          ^^^^^ help: try ignoring the field: `title: _`
   |
   = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default
```

```rust
fn main() -> Result<()> {
    color_eyre::install()?;

    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title: _ } => todo!(),
    }
}
```

The second issue is that the `opt` variable is moved
before we try to destructure it. If we look at the
compiler output before we fixed the `title` issue we
see the value use after move pointing at `title`
specifically.

```
error[E0382]: use of moved value
m  --> src/main.rs:32:26
   |
29 |     let opt = Opt::from_args();
   |         --- move occurs because `opt` has type `Opt`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
30 |     dbg!(opt);
   |     ---------- value moved here
31 |     match opt.cmd {
32 |         Command::Write { title } => todo!(),
   |                          ^^^^^ value used here after move
```

If we look at it after fixing the unused `title`,
we see the compiler point at `opt.cmd`.

```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `opt.cmd`
  --> src/main.rs:31:11
   |
29 |     let opt = Opt::from_args();
   |         --- move occurs because `opt` has type `Opt`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
30 |     dbg!(opt);
   |     ---------- value moved here
31 |     match opt.cmd {
   |           ^^^^^^^ value used here after move
```

This is because opt is moved into the `dbg` call because
it doesn't implement the `Copy` trait. Now, we could
implement or derive `Copy` for `Opt` if `Command` can
implement `Copy`, but we can not implement `Copy` for
`Command`. This is because `String` does not, and can not,
implement `Copy`, and we have a `String` in our `title`.

Without diving into the depths of `Copy`, [`Clone`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/clone/trait.Clone.html),
and allocation, there is something we have that already
implements `Copy`, so we don't need to.

Shared references implement `Copy`.

So instead of passing `opt` into `dbg!`, and thus using
move semantics (which are the default in Rust), we can
pass a shared reference in: `dgb!(&opt)` which lets us
use copy semantics.

The difference between move semantics and copy semantics
in this case is that we can access `opt` after passing it
to `dbg!`.

Under the hood, both a copy and a move can result in bits
being copied in memory, although this is sometimes
optimized away. -- [Copy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html)

```rust
fn main() -> Result<()> {
    let opt = Opt::from_args();
    dbg!(&opt);
    match opt.cmd {
        Command::Write { title: _ } => todo!(),
    }
}
```

Matching structopt commands and using Rust values after move

Cargo allows us to execute a few different kinds of tests,
including integration and unit. For now we'll talk about
integration tests for our CLI. Integration tests
live in `/tests` and only have access to the public
interface of a crate.

In this case, we'll run the `garden` binary using
`assert_cmd` and assert various things about the
execution and output. For example, that the binary
exits successfully and that stderr has no output.

`cargo test` allows us to run all tests.

To restrict the number of tests that run to only the two
that work, we can use `cargo test help` to restrict
cargo to only running tests that match the keyword "help",
or use `#[ignore]` on a test we want to ignore.

The third test will be ignored because we have yet to
build out our functionality.

Integration testing Cargo binaries with assert_cmd

The StructOpt crate allows us to derive our human person functionality from our Struct definitions. 

We will create a `structop` for our `write` subcommand that will take a short and long flag for our `title` argument

---

```
cargo add structopt
```

structopt allows us to derive argument parsing functionality from our
structs. The name is a play on `struct Opt {}`. To do this we need to
`derive(StructOpt)` on our struct. In this case we have a subcommand,
so we'll set up one of the fields on the `Opt` struct to be a
`structopt(subcommand)`. This subcommand value will be an enum,
indicating that only one subcommand can be used at a time.

structopt also gives us tools to specify one of three argument types:

* positional
* short
* long

By default every argument is a positional argument, which means that in
this case if we left it as-is, the CLI would function as

```
garden write my-title
```

We want to use a flag, so we'll use structopt to generate short and long
flags for the title argument with `structopt(short, long)`. That gives
the use the option of `-t` and `--title` to specify a title.

structopt also contains some type processing, so all we need to do is
specify that title is an optional string and the flags will become
optional. That is: a user can specify or not specify a title.

```rust
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
enum Command {
    Write {
        #[structopt(short, long)]
        title: Option<String>,
    },
}
```

After setting up `struct Opt`, we can parse the args and use
the dbg!() macro to print them to the console so we can see
what they look like.

```rust
let opt = Opt::from_args();
dbg!(opt);
```

To do that we also need to `derive(Debug)` in addition to
structopt on both the enum and the struct.

Given input like

```
garden write
```

We will see the following output.

```rust
[src/main.rs:21] opt = Opt {
    cmd: Write {
        title: None,
    },
}
```

We can choose to `cargo build` and then `./target/debug/garden write`
or we can use `cargo run -- write`. The `--` ensures that our arguments
get passed to the CLI we're building and not `cargo run`. This is
especially relevant when passing something like `--help`.

Setting up git-like subcommands using structopt

if we run `cargo run -- --help`, we can see that structopt
thinks the name of our binary is still the package name.
We can change that with another attribute macro on our
struct.

```
digital-garden 0.1.0

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write
```

Also notice that in the help text the `help` subcommand
has some helpful output while `write` has none:

```
garden 0.1.0

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write
```

There are a number of places we can put doc comments.
We can write on the `Opt` struct for global information
about the CLI.

We can also write on each subcommand or even the options
for each subcommand.

```
/// A CLI for the growing and curation of a digital garden
///
/// Visit https://www.rustadventure.rs/garden for more!
struct Opt {
    #[structopt(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}
enum Command {
    /// write something in your garden
    ///
    /// This command will open your $EDITOR, wait for you
    /// to write something, and then save the file to your
    /// garden
    Write {
        /// Optionally set a title for what you are going to write about
        #[structopt(short, long)]
        title: Option<String>,
    },
}
```

Each of these results in documentation going to the relevant
place in the CLI help text. Note especially that the first
line of doc comment for subcommands is shown as "short"
help text, while the full text is reserved for running
`--help` directly on the subcommand.

```
❯ cargo run
garden 0.1.0
A CLI for the growing and curation of a digital garden

Visit https://www.rustadventure.rs/garden for more!

USAGE:
    garden <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

SUBCOMMANDS:
    help     Prints this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
    write    write something in your garden
```

```
❯ cargo run -- write --help
garden-write 0.1.0
write something in your garden

This command will open your $EDITOR, wait for you to write something, and then save the file to your garden

USAGE:
    garden write [OPTIONS]

FLAGS:
    -h, --help
            Prints help information

    -V, --version
            Prints version information

OPTIONS:
    -t, --title <title>
            Optionally set a title for what you are going to write about
```

Also note that `-h` and `--help` are *not* the same thing when it comes to structopt.

Documenting and writing helptext for Structopt CLI commands and flags

Right now we are using the `todo!()` macro which is great for simulating when our program panics. The error message that we get can be improved upon.

We will look at color-eyre that will allow us to handle the errors we receive to be more visual and human-readable. 

---
The `todo!` macro is useful and it also exposes what
happens if our application panics.

```
thread 'main' panicked at 'not yet implemented', src/main.rs:2:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```

This could be both more readable and contain more information
while also being colored using [color_eyre](https://docs.rs/color-eyre/0.5.10/color_eyre/).

```
The application panicked (crashed).
Message:  not yet implemented
Location: src/main.rs:5

Backtrace omitted.
Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 environment variable to display it.
Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=full to include source snippets.
```

We'll use [cargo-edit](https://crates.io/crates/cargo-edit)
to add the package to our Cargo.toml.

```
cargo install cargo-edit
cargo add color_eyre
```

`main` can return `Result`, so we'll use `color_eyre`'s
`Result` as our return value and `color_eyre::install` to
install the default panic and error reporting hooks.
`install` returns a `Result` so we can use `?` to handle
any errors if necessary.

We haven't shown off everything that color_eyre is capable
of. In addition to panic handling, color_eyre allows us to
track additional information in the context of our errors
and include suggestions by taking advantage of distributed
[tracing](https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing) infrastructure.

We'll see more of how this helps as we build out the CLI.

Using color_eyre and distributed tracing to yield better error messages to the user

We'll replace the `println!` macro with a call to `todo!`, which has
the additional benefit of type-checking so we won't need to finish
anything with `todo!` in the expression. Note that if we call a function
with `todo!`, we do get the `panic!` behavior.

We do have two other options for achieving the same thing,
`unimplemented!` and `panic!`. All three of these options functionally
do the same thing: they crash the program immediately.

We aren't using `panic!` because `panic!` should be used when a program
reaches an unrecoverable state. We don't have an unrecoverable state
so much as a piece of the program we intend to work on later.

For similar reasons, we aren't using `unimplemented!` because we want
to convey that this is something to work on while `unimplemented!`
doesn't necessarily mean that we intend to work on it.

Using the todo macro to typecheck unwritten code that will be implemented in the future

In `./target/debug/` we can see the binary name:
`digital-garden-steps`. This is the name of our package
and we want the actual binary that users install to be
named `garden` instead.

To do this we can change the auto-discovered `src/main.rs`
binary and change the name using a `bin` config in the
`Cargo.toml` file.

```toml
[[bin]]
name = "garden"
path = "src/main.rs"
```

Then we see `./target/debug/garden` get created when we
`cargo run` or `cargo build`.

Rename the default Cargo binary to be different than the package name

```shell
cargo init
```

By default cargo initializes a new package containing a *binary* crate.
The file that gets compiled into the binary is located at
`src/main.rs`. This is by convention and we can specify different paths
and names for binaries.

We also get a `Cargo.lock` and a `Cargo.toml`. These are similar to
JavaScript's `package.json` and `package-lock.json` or `yarn.lock`.
The `Cargo.toml` defines different features of our package including
`dependencies`, defining zero or one library crates, and defining as
many binary crates as we want.

We can run the new binary with `cargo run`.

```shell
❯ cargo run
   Compiling digital-garden-steps v0.1.0 (/digital-garden-steps)
    Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1.38s
     Running `target/debug/digital-garden-steps`
Hello, world!
```

Initialize a new Cargo binary crate in a new package

By writing the README first we can explore different
approaches to the user experience of our CLI. We
could think through the entire CLI right now, but we'll
leave other subcommands for later. Instead, we'll focus
on the fact that we know we will have multiple subcommands
and design the command on which all others rely: `write`.

We can come up with a first example subcommand. Note that
by doing this we are also defining the name of the binary
as `garden`.

```shell
garden write
```

When writing, users will not necessarily know the title of
what they're writing in advance, so we will not require
them to provide it. This leads us to an optional title
argument. We could have chosen to make this a positional
argument, but we made it a flag instead to delineate from
other potential future positional arguments (such as
`--message`, which we have chosen not to implement now).

```shell
garden write -t "Writing about Rust"
```

README-driven planning for a Digital Garden CLI in Rust

[Rustlings](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings) is a set of exercises that serves as a great introduction to the Rust language. It covers many concepts from the [Rust book](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/) by asking you to work through sets of exercises.

This collection walks you through Rustlings in a way that explains what's going on in each exercise. We cover everything from basic types to generics and threading.

Learning Rust by Working Through the Rustlings Exercises

[README](https://github.com/ChristopherBiscardi/rustlings/blob/egghead/exercises/generics/README.md) for this exercise.

Rustlings generics3: Constraining generics using traits

Mock Service Worker is an API mocking library that allows you to write client-agnostic mocks and reuse them across any frameworks, tools, and environments.



Mocking WebSocket APIs with Mock Service Worker


While using anonymous functions might seem convenient, they can create difficulties when trying to identify performance bottlenecks during profiling. This lesson will demonstrate how named functions make it easier to pinpoint and address performance issues, ultimately leading to more efficient and debuggable code. Learning this practice will greatly improve your ability to locate and fix performance issues in complex projects.

Always Name Functions in JavaScript


When attempting to load the same module twice in JavaScript you'll hit a cache and code won't re-run. In scenarios where you actually do want to have state in your modules, you'll have to use a cache-busting technique by passing a query parameter to a dynamic import. This lesson walks through how to add a query parameter, how to add the appropriate types for loading dynamic modules in TypeScript, and when these techniques are valuable.

Import the Same JavaScript Module Multiple Times with Cache Busting



The include keyword in GitHub Actions empowers you to add custom variables to your matrix strategy, providing flexibility beyond standard configurations. In this video, we'll explore how include allows you to define specific combinations of variables, enhancing control over your workflow runs. You'll see how this feature enables you to tailor jobs for unique environments or scenarios not covered by the default matrix options. By leveraging include, you can efficiently manage complex build processes with greater precision. This technique helps you streamline your CI/CD pipeline, making it more adaptable to your project's evolving needs.

Use GitHub Actions Matrix Include for Complex Job Configurations

While running `zod` schema validation agains domain-rich objects, the error message saying that _a string is not a number_ might not be really useful.

Especially, when you need to provide a meaningful feeback to the user, e.g. after they have submitted a form with lots of data.

`zod` allows to customize messages on a very granular level. We can also extract repeatable customization to `zod` error maps.

Finally, in order to process an error message further (e.g. display it to the user), we need to handle the `zod` validation errors effectively. Especially, when a big object validation has failed and we could receive a handful of errors.

That's what we learn in this lesson. 🔥

Customize zod Error Messages and Handle zod Errors Effectively

customize zod validation messages, customize zod schema property messages, reuse error maps across different schemas, navigate through zod error objects

You might want to run `zod` schema checks in different styles.

Sometimes you prefer to conditionally throw the error - that's what `parse` does. But another time you'd prefer to receive a `boolean` property that determines whether the validation was successful or not - and perform further actions accordingly.

Additionally, the error-throwing API of `parse` works extremely well with [TypeScript assertion functions](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-7.html#assertion-functions). Their combination is just... perfect! 👌

That's what we learn in this lesson.

Use parse and safeParse Runtime Type-checks with zod

use zod parse function to conditionally throw ZodError, use zod safeParse to get a boolean value and run typescript type guard over success property

In this lesson we learn that TypeScript cannot guarantee correct shapes of responses. That's due to TS performing checks in compile-time, while the response will be availbale in runtime - when TS doesn't exist anymore.

In some situations, such as HTTP requests, runtime type checks such as `zod` are essential for providing quick feedback around data-related errors.

Understand where are the possible mistakes to make while using TypeScript with HTTP calls. Use `fetch` and `axios` along with `zod` schema checks.

Also, note that similar mistakes or mistakes could happen while using web storage (e.g. `localStorage`)

Validate HTTP API Response with zod, fetch and axios

use zod as an HTTP response validation tool along with fetch and axios in order to make sure that the response has expected data structure

In this lesson we learn that the `zod` schemas become the single source of truth.

We shall not update TypeScript types manually, since they are generated automatically from the schema.

Same with validation functions.

Whenever the schema changes, all the rest will update accordingly. It's an important mind shift.

Treat zod Schemas as Single Source of Truth

Zod Schemas are the single source of truth for both typescript types, and interfaces - and runtime validation functions. Schemas should be updated first.

`zod` is powerful, but writing the schemas manually for existing JSON objects, especially big ones, can be time-consuming.

But that's what `quicktype` is for! You can get 80% work done instantly! 🥳

Depending on your need - whether you want to automate the process, or do it just one time, you can:
- use an online app
- use an IDE extension
- run a CLI script
- generate a script to be executed within CI/CD environment/tooling

And this is what we learn in this lesson! 🔥🔥🔥

Get started with zod quickly!

Generate zod Schemas Automatically using Quicktype App, Extensions and Scripts

Use quicktype app, extension or scripts to automatically generate zod schemas from existing json files. Save time and get started with zod quickly!

`zod` is a powerful library allowing to run runtime type-checks.

It's complementary to TypeScript, which does type checks in compile time.

In this lesson we create few schemas that represent primitive type values, along with `zod` utilities which make these more precise. We also create object schemas and nest one inside another.

All schemas are being validated against example values. We analyze how to interpret error messages in case of failures.

Perform Runtime Type-checks on Primitives and Objects with zod

Create zod schemas to validate primitive type and object type values in runtime. Analyze the errors to see how a value doesn't correspond to schema expectations

Rust

Search Results