⚠️ This lesson is retired and might contain outdated information.

Audit your App with Chrome Devtools

Share this video with your friends

Social Share Links

Send Tweet
Published 7 years ago
Updated 9 months ago

Once you get a PWA working, you want to measure how performant and optimized it is, get feedback and act accordingly. In this lesson I’ll show you how to audit your PWA and compare it to the equivalent SPA.

Instructor: [00:00] the Chrome browser already comes with a great audit tool. To find it, open the dev tools, and you'll see this Audit stub in here. In order to run an audit, we just have to click this Perform an Audit button, and you'll see that a pop-up opens where you can select which sections of this audit to perform.

[00:22] We're going to keep them all selected and press Run Audit. Then, it will start running it in an Asus 5X device, and we'll let it. The audit runs from a fresh install without any service worker and cache enabled. It also [indecipherable] then our work to our 3G connection and perform other kind of test like listening for the unload event or running it without JavaScript.

[00:53] At the top section, you'll find the score of the four sections that we have tested. Don't panic if you find some scores that are not that high, for example, the performance. Performance can vary from one run to another. To be honest, the audit tests are quite strict. You can always take the feedback to improve the application.

[01:17] Remember that Progressive Web Apps is a never-ending journey, and you can always improve it. Below this hoverview with the scores, you'll find more details of each of the sections. For example, for the Progressive Web Apps section, there are two failed audits where we cannot do too much. One, it has to do with the server. Right now, this app is deployed in a test server. This other metric is about performance [indecipherable] .

[01:46] We check all the past audits. They all are the most needed for the progressive web app, so register a service worker, available offline, using HTTPS, make it installable, and so on. If we scroll down to the Performance, we'll see this timeline where you can see how the app renders along the time.

[02:11] Here, we can see some interesting metrics. The first one is the first meaningful paint. That metric tells when there is some content visible in the screen. Then, we also have the first interactive metric and describes when the application has rendered already and the user can start interacting with it, which means that the JavaScript has already been loaded and parsed.

[02:33] If we scroll down a little bit more, you'll see this Opportunities section, which gives you some hints on how can you improve your application. Of course, the main issue of this application is that it's using a [indecipherable] from a third-party server which is also kind of an image placeholder server. If you have your own server, you should use the HTTP cache in order to make it as performant as possible.

[03:01] In this case, we have no control about these images. There is this third hint about reducing render blocking with style sheet. If we go to the code and open the index HTML, we have this CSS style sheet which is loaded from Google APS. This style sheet is loaded in a normal way, which by default is render blocking.

[03:28] That means that, until our render blocking resource hasn't been loaded, the unload event of the window is not triggered. That delays the render of the application. We can use some strategies to defer the loading of this style sheet. Let's continue scrolling and click on the Pause Audits.

[03:50] Between all this, you can see that the off-screen images is parsed, which is because of Linux loading the images that are not in the screen. If you keep scrolling down, you'll see the Accessibility and the Best Practices audits...

egghead
egghead
~ 3 minutes ago

Member comments are a way for members to communicate, interact, and ask questions about a lesson.

The instructor or someone from the community might respond to your question Here are a few basic guidelines to commenting on egghead.io

Be on-Topic

Comments are for discussing a lesson. If you're having a general issue with the website functionality, please contact us at support@egghead.io.

Avoid meta-discussion

  • This was great!
  • This was horrible!
  • I didn't like this because it didn't match my skill level.
  • +1 It will likely be deleted as spam.

Code Problems?

Should be accompanied by code! Codesandbox or Stackblitz provide a way to share code and discuss it in context

Details and Context

Vague question? Vague answer. Any details and context you can provide will lure more interesting answers!

Markdown supported.
Become a member to join the discussionEnroll Today