Enter Your Email Address to Watch This Lesson

Your link to unlock this lesson will be sent to this email address.

Unlock this lesson and all 985 of the free egghead.io lessons, plus get JavaScript content delivered directly to your inbox!

Existing egghead members will not see this. Sign in.

Arrow Function => in ES6

2:57 JavaScript lesson by

ECMAscript 6 introduces the "arrow function" as a shortcut for creating anonymous functions with this scope bound.

Get the Code Now
click to level up

egghead.io comment guidelines


ECMAscript 6 introduces the "arrow function" as a shortcut for creating anonymous functions with this scope bound.


In the second example where you show that 'this' references the outer scope, what if you needed to access this.handleMessage inside of that function?


It's a tall order, but if you could find ways to narrate the video above without using "this" as a demonstrative, and only as a JS keyword, then it would be a lot easier to take in. So when highlighting something, refer to "the highlighted section" instead of "this".

I appreciate this is easier said than done. ...dammit.

Let's rewrite this createGreeting function to the arrow function style. Let's say arrowGreeting is message name and then the fat arrow with some braces and return message + name. Now, that actually looks about the same.

var createGreeting = function(message, name){
  return message + name;

var arrowGreeting = (message,name) => {
  return message + name;

The only difference really is that this is on the right side, whereas the function keyword is on the left side, so that'd be here, whereas this would go here. But we can actually make this much smaller.

First, let's remove the braces. I'll remove him, remove him, and move everything up the same line and remove the return keyword. This will automatically return message + name. You don't have to write the return keyword when you don't have the braces in there.

var arrowGreeting = (message,name) => message + name;

Second, if there's only one parameter, like you only take in a message, you can actually get rid of the surrounding parens here and just say message would return message, or message would return hello, or whatever you want it to return. That's why you'll see something like var squared is X, which returns X * X to be X squared.

var arrowGreeting = message => "hello";

var squared = x => x * x;

An extremely common scenario that you've probably run into before whether though click handlers or anything else is that, you write a function to handle some sort of action and you write the body of the function, and you run into the scenario where you'll assign that = this because you actually want to get the name off of the parent scope.

var deliveryBoy = {
  name: "John",

  handleMessage: function (message, hangler) {

  receive: function () {
    var that = this;

    this.handleMessage("Hello, ", function(message) {
      that.name //get the proper name

      console.log(message + that.name);

The name doesn't exist inside of this scope so we have to do the that is this, and then, to get this in here, you refer to that. It can get pretty confusing.

Now, the arrow function actually helps handle this scenario. I'm going to delete the function keyword. I'll use the arrow function syntax. Then, that here can just become this. I can delete this line, delete that, and this now refers to the outer scope outside of this function because it's passing in this lexical scope that's coming in from above the function.

receive: function () {

  this.handleMessage("Hello, ", (message) => {
        console.log(message + this.name);

this is no longer referring to the scope inside of the function. It's referring to the scope that's outside of the function.

Again, if you'd prefer to do this in one line of code, we can delete this brace and bring everything up a line. We can delete the semicolon and delete the closing brace. We can remove the paren from here and handle this nicely in a simple one-liner.

receive: function () {

  this.handleMessage("Hello, ", message => console.log(message + this.name))

When I run this, you can see it prints out Hello, John because this is actually this handler right here and it's getting this message through here, which is coming from here. When the message goes here to here to here, down into our arrow function, I add it to this name, and this.name is this name now...

Joel's Head
Why are we asking?