Become a member
to unlock all features

Level Up!

Access all courses & lessons on egghead today and lock-in your price for life.


    Lift into a Pointed Functor with of


    We examine the of function we've seen on a few types and discover it's the Pointed interface.



    Become a Member to view code

    You must be a Pro Member to view code

    Access all courses and lessons, track your progress, gain confidence and expertise.

    Become a Member
    and unlock code for this lesson
    orLog In




    You may have seen this function of popup here now. It's really a generic interface to be able to place a value into our type, or we call it lifting a value to our type. Here, we have Task.of. If we say ('hello'), we end up with a Task of ('hello'). If we have an Either.of('hello'), we end up with a Right of ('hello').

    Similarly, if we have a Box.of say (100)...we're just picking arbitrary values here. We're just putting those values inside our types, and this is regardless of any constructor complexities here.

    If you recall Task as the constructor where we take a reject function, a result function, and resolve this, then this would be much more complex and not to the generic interface that I could use to program functions that just pop a value into a type, not worrying about any constructors or specifics.

    Why did we choose right instead of left?

    That's a terrific question. The reason for this is that one of the contracts or intuitions of of here, is that once I popup a value into my of, I want to be able to start mapping and chaining and using all of those generic interface functions on this value. If this was to return a left, we wouldn't be able to actually map over it.

    It would just ignore maps and chains. That's kind of ignoring the contract of of, which would just lift a value into a type and start working with it as if it's a total success and things work the way they should.